On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Quim Gil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ass soon as we agree on the total amount of slots we will need to find
> out the best way of scheduling those sessions. A thread apart.
>
Noted.

> Good point. Maybe we can have plenary session every day at 9am, 3 in
> total. If we need more we could go for the last slots of the day at 4pm
> (maybe not the last day, though).

Sounds good.

> Maybe we don't want an unconference after all?  ;)
>
> Something we did in a couple of Maemo Summits was to have an open wiki
> where people could schedule their own sessions as long as they were
> filling empty slots or negotiating swaps with other slots. A few people
> "content committee" could move talks to better spots, and there was some
> spots left empty on purpose for last minute sessions.
>
> No call for papers, but no unconference either. I personally liked it
> but FULL DISCLOSURE I came up with that proposal, and it received some
> criticism as well. No system is perfect.
>
What was the criticism about? It sounds like a good compromise between
unconf and order ;) In Ubuntu confs, all the BoFs are pre-scheduled
AFAIR but the sessions themselves are informal and unconf'd.

> Let's stick to 50' sessions followed by 10' break. This allows simpler
> schedules, more buffer between sessions for everybody to move on and

Actually, I wanted to leave 15 minutes to move around (hence 45') and
take a quick restroom break. Getting down to gory details, again from
my personal experience 10 minutes between sessions is not enough if
you want also to have a few words with the folks of the previous
session, and be in time for the next one.

> decent frequent breaks saving us from the more complicated 30' breaks.
> There is a 2h break at midday, which already leaves plenty of
> non-scheduled time.
>
So the 2h break midday will cover for 10' breaks between sessions?
(IMHO  abit too short ;)


-Sivan
_______________________________________________
Marketing mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

Reply via email to