On 04/19/2012 04:03 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > Pre-scheduling a few sessions is good. But I really would like to leave at > least 40% of the slots free, for on-site scheduling. We aren't sure who's > coming or what subjects will turn up during discussion. > > As a consequence, there's also a temporal component: more sessions pre- > scheduled for the beginning of the event, fewer towards the end.
Very good points. In practice this could mean: - 3 morning plenary sessions defined in advanced. - 2 afternoon hack & tell sessions also 'blobked'. - First day's schedule (June 21, Thursday) partially populated with MUST sessions. Process to propose a MUST session to be defined. (Michael & Sivan, ideas welcome). - Part of day 1 track sessions and all of day 2 & 3 left empty for unconference adhoc scheduling. -- Quim _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
