I am not of the education level of Mister Holtz.
  But in this case, maybe it's to my advantage.
   
  Brian is not advocating killing anyone, much 
  less the 'innocent fat man' in the trolley problem.
   
  He's using this as an example to teach 'purist'
  Libertarians a lesson.  Just as the Bible and
  other literature uses allegories and other
  methods to teach by example, so does Brian
  with the trolley problem.
   
  He is making the case that answers to many
  problems and situations are not so simply
  answered by an imaginary Libertarian 
  'Biblical' canon.
   
  Rather, Libertarians can (and should) learn
  from many sides of the discussion, both
  from within, and without, rather than 
  dismissing anyone who dare disagree as
  heretical and plain old wrong.
   
  Of course, I will defer to the sage himself
  as to the accuracy of my oversimplification.
   
  In the news and of relevance to this 
  discussion, from Front Page Magazine:
  http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=27231 
   
  BC: We live in times that make libertarians
  shudder, and, in turn, have caused many
  Republicans to abandon the Grand Old
  Spending Party. Given these circumstances,
  what is your opinion about a flight to quality?
  Do you regard the Libertarian Party as being
  a viable alternative for conservatives? 
   
  DH: Some of my best friends are libertarians
  and the greatest intellectual influence on me
  was Hayek. However, in practical political
  matters, libertarians tend to live in alternate
  universe, without regard for the real world
  consequences of their actions.  Ron Paul –
  the only Libertarian in Congress – is a
  disgrace. He has waged a war against
  America’s war on terror, in lockstep with the
  left, and against the state of Israel, the
  frontline democracy in this war. 


Harland Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
          The "Trolley Problem" which Brian Holtz tries to use
to justify aggression amounts to this: Do you push an
innocent fat man in front of a trolley, if killling
him that way would save other people further down the
track?

The fat guy owns his own life; if he wants to stop the
trolley he can jump in front of it. Pushing the fat
guy is legally murder. Yet Holtz advocates pushing
him. Philosopher Judith Thomson devised this problem
because she thought nobody would ever believe you
should push the fat man in front of the trolley. 

I don't suggest that anybody needs to argue this
again; and certainly not here. But consider the
points of view. Dictators make their trolleys run on
tiime because they own your life and can kill you when
it is convenient. Libertarians believe you own your
own life, and nobody, not even the government, has the
right to take your life from you.

If you want to read about trolley massacre, see Brian
Holtz site:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marketliberal/message/861
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marketliberal/message/810

The subject has already been explored

Harland Harrison
LP of San Mateo County CA

--- Brian Holtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes :
> Susan Hogarth wrote:
> 
> SH> I think that a person is more or less
> libertarian according to the amount of aggression
> (including taxation) he advocates. <SH
> 
> A better metric is the net incidence of aggression
> that would occur if his policies were adopted. 
> An even better metric might be to differentiate the
> latter metric over the time variable: the change in
> the net incidence of aggression that would occur
> because of the policy changes he advocates.
> 
> Aggression does not end up minimized if
> liberty-lovers merely resolve to promote
> aggression-virginity through the example
> of their chastity. The just-say-no approach of
> aggression abstinence has the virtue of requiring
> less thinking (e.g. about counterfactuals), but it
> fails to minimize aggression in the real world,
> and even runs aground in basic thought
> experiments such as the Trolley Problem
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem> .
> 
> Again, the child and her doctor both oppose pain,
> but only one recognizes the necessity of needles.
> 
> 





__________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur 
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com


         

       
---------------------------------
 Get your own web address.
 Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.

Reply via email to