Can you Data::Dumper() on the grammar object for cases that fails ?
Thanks, JD.

Le dimanche 22 décembre 2013 20:10:09 UTC+1, rns a écrit :
>
> All fine on cygwin; however, sl_advent.t fails all 'using char class' and 
> 'using hex' tests ('using strings' are all ok) on perl 5.14.2 under WinXP 
> SP3 (cl MS VS .NET 2003) for me, logs attached. 
>
> Jean-Damien's gist <https://gist.github.com/jddurand/8047822> runs ok.
>
> I saw Marpa-R2 2.077_014 passed on mswin32 under higher version perls so 
> perhaps it's only me, but just in case. :)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Jeffrey Kegler <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>  I've just uploaded a new release candidate, Marpa-R2 
>> 2.077_014<https://metacpan.org/release/JKEGL/Marpa-R2-2.077_014>, 
>> to CPAN.  In it the SLIF recognizer's named argument processing is changed 
>> to leave the original hash untouched.
>>
>> I've left myself some flexibility by not changing the documentation, but 
>> realistically, given my attitude toward regressions, this pretty much 
>> paints me into a corner on the issue.
>>
>> I opened myself to this kind of argument hash manipulation by allowing 
>> multiple argument hashes.  That is, for most Marpa methods that take named 
>> arguments, you can do
>>
>>  $obj->method( { arg1 => value }, { arg2 => value, arg3 => value }, ...)
>>
>>  Allowing this is unusual in Perl modules -- it may even be one of my 
>> inventions.  I originally did it to overcome one of the limits of Perl's 
>> hashes-as-named-arguments processing -- lack of control over the order.  
>> Allowing more than one hash allows you to both use hashes and to specify 
>> the order in which the arugments will be processed.  Order of argument 
>> processing is not an issue in the SLIF, but in some previous Marpa 
>> interfaces it was.  As one example, in the Pure Perl versions, it was often 
>> useful to specify at what point in the argument processing certain kinds of 
>> tracing were turned on or off.
>>
>> Anyway, once you start to put together the named arguments in pieces, 
>> that very naturally carries over into a desire to reuse the pieces.
>>
>> -- jeffrey
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "marpa parser" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"marpa parser" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to