If you ignore the null rule it'll blow your mind less if you think about it as:
A ::= B | 'hello!' A ::= There's no conceptual reason that the null rule couldn't be the last "alternative" but I believe the DSL grammar won't allow it hence it's a separate statement. On Jun 18, 2014, at 9:37, Paul Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: >> A ::= B >> A ::= 'hello!' >> A ::= # empty > > Point not taken. Point, in fact, blew my mind. More research is required. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
