On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marpa can parse C, XML, JavaScript, SQL, IDL ... (2) >> >> > This makes me think some of the Perl modules can be listed twice, once as > now in a long list and a few under a new category called say 'Language > Parsing' or perhaps they could just go under 'Applications'. > > Ideas? > They could just go under 'Applications'; whether they deserve to form a group, and other matters of Applications arrangement can perhaps be decided later, when the Applications list is finalized? One grouping criterion which comes to mind is production-ready/under development/experimental/planned per Jeffrey's thought above. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
