On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, 29 August 2014 08:13:41 UTC+10, rns wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Marpa can parse C, XML, JavaScript, SQL, IDL ... (2) >>>> >>>> >>> This makes me think some of the Perl modules can be listed twice, once >>> as now in a long list and a few under a new category called say 'Language >>> Parsing' or perhaps they could just go under 'Applications'. >>> >> >>> Ideas? >>> >> They could just go under 'Applications'; whether they deserve to form a >> group, and other matters of Applications arrangement can perhaps be decided >> later, when the Applications list is finalized? >> >> One grouping criterion which comes to mind is production-ready/under >> development/experimental/planned per Jeffrey's thought above. >> > > I'm reluctant to do that because it's a type of fragmentation, firstly, > and secondly because the code can change categories, which means more work > (from someone) keeping track of that. > > Better to just give a basic category and people can click to find the > current status. > Makes sense. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "marpa parser" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
