On Friday, 29 August 2014 08:13:41 UTC+10, rns wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Ron Savage <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Marpa can parse C, XML, JavaScript, SQL, IDL ... (2) >>> >>> >> This makes me think some of the Perl modules can be listed twice, once as >> now in a long list and a few under a new category called say 'Language >> Parsing' or perhaps they could just go under 'Applications'. >> > >> Ideas? >> > They could just go under 'Applications'; whether they deserve to form a > group, and other matters of Applications arrangement can perhaps be decided > later, when the Applications list is finalized? > > One grouping criterion which comes to mind is production-ready/under > development/experimental/planned per Jeffrey's thought above. >
I'm reluctant to do that because it's a type of fragmentation, firstly, and secondly because the code can change categories, which means more work (from someone) keeping track of that. Better to just give a basic category and people can click to find the current status. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa parser" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
