What do you mean? DOn't you understand even the most elementary thing
about imperialism, that it is the main enemy, and when it attacks a
semi-colony we defend the semi-colony, even to the extent of
militarily blocking with the national bourgeoisie, maintaining the
armed independence of the working class. Why don't you read Trotsky
on China.
As for WW2 your precious Cannon blocked with his bourgeoisie against
Hitler. See if you can deny that.
And as for Chechnya. As you well know in the exchanges we had on the
character of Russia today, when you stupidly claimed that Russia
today was imperialist becuase it was before the Revolution, I stated
that despite Russia's semi-colonial character today, if it attacked
breakaway nationalist movements that were not backed by imperialism,
then I would be against Russia. Just as I am against Indonesia in E
Timor, but would subordinate this to the defence of Indonesia if
attacked by imperialism.
Wake up Spartoid.
> Dave writes!
>
> In a war between the US and NZ I will bloc militarily with the NZ
> bourgeoisie.
>
> Dave
>
>
> Yes he would. And which side would you have blocked with in WW2 out of your
> little NZ perspective. This I think a realistic alternative.
>
> And which side in the Russia/Chetchenen stuff?
>
> Warm Regards
> Bob Malecki
>
>
>
> --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
>
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
