******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
I ctually think the major difference on this comes down less to policy to Trump's peculiar eagerness to wallow in his bigotry and celebrate it. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 12:24 PM A.R. G via Marxism < marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote: > ******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** > #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. > #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. > #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. > ***************************************************************** > > I was honestly thinking the same thing. Note, however, a Clinton > Administration probably would have also tried banning people from most of > those countries, as did Obama, but without legitimating any overt racial > discrimination. A Merrick Garland would have sided with dissenters, pushing > it to 5-4 against. > > Also, note, my understanding (I haven't had a chance to do a thorough read > as I am slagging off at work) is that this only applies to the pre-trial > enforcement of the Muslim ban. That is, the plaintiffs can still go to > court and litigate the religious discrimination angle, but it wasn't enough > to keep the order from being enforced *before* litigation is completed. > _________________________________________________________ > Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm > Set your options at: > http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/markalause%40gmail.com > _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
