======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


"Joaquin Bustelo" wrote

Kathleen [kmcook] writes about the Democrats: "The party needs to get 
back to honesty and open government."

Hi. Let me suggest you're on the wrong mailing list. There isn't anyone 
hereabouts who think the Democrats were EVER about "honesty" and "open 
government" and much less that somehow they were democratic until May 
2008. The Democrats are the oldest continuous capitalist party in the 
world, and as such are merely continuing to be true to the tiny clique 
of bankers and big businessmen (and, yes, it had been almost exclusively 
"men") who have been he true masters of this country since it was founded.

You will probably be more comfortable posting in forums like the 
Huffington post or MSNBC or with that sort of outlook. Continuing to 
post here most likely will simply get you pilloried.

Joaquin
------------------------------------------
I don't know what the demographics Les is generating will show about the 
participation of women on this list, if that's even an item in the 
compilation, but this is certainly not going to help anyone find their 
"comfort level" or increase their understanding. No one has mentioned 
this for some time, but it needs to be taken up repeatedly. I know that 
a lot of those contributing and lurking here didn't get involved forty 
years ago in a deep reading of the Marxist classics, or in 20th century 
Trotskyist sectarian politics, and if this is predominantly an old boy 
network rehashing past sectarian history and nattering on about arcane, 
often extraneous trivia instead of continually offering a leg up to the 
newly aware, then we'll wait patiently and regretfully for its demise. 
But it's a shame, because flaming and pillorying contests will, despite 
the moderators' occasional reminders, surely drive younger, otherwise 
responsive people of any gender away who could find value here and 
thereby be part of the solution, especially if they weren't overwhelmed 
by static that has no meaning for them. There's much otherwise very 
helpful information to be gained here, and very few other places, for 
anyone seeking to join in the effort for a saner, more equitable world, 
and we may or may not be ever mindful that the philosophical and 
theoretical underpinnings of the living Marxist project address that, 
are profound beyond measure and will outlast pettifogging, wherever it 
occurs. The mission statement on Lou and Les's prefatory page declares 
that this list has a very good signal to noise ratio, and while that may 
be comparatively true it's still drearily high. That's perhaps an 
inescapable aspect of largely anonymous email exchanges, where people do 
not meet face to face and one-up-person-ship is often present, but this 
doesn't help any of us, man or woman, attend to the main objectives that 
discussion here is purportedly about.

Ralph

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to