======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


I'm acquainted with Ben Dangl.  In fact, I attended the book launch in 
Burlington, Vermont for "Dancing with Dynamite" just the other night.  
He said something to the effect that it was good to have states that 
provided support for social movements but that social movements should 
be on their guard and not cease whatever they're doing because a 
"progressive" government comes to power.  Sounds like the right 
"balance" to me.

jay


> I am by no means an expert on Dangl's journalism but I have the very
> strong suspicion that he is an anarchist. Ever since the Zapatistas,
> there have been a number of U.S. journalists and scholars who
> practically equate state power with evil. It leads to fetishizing direct
> action, civil society, the "social movements", indigenous organizations
> against an oppressive "Socialist, state-led" machine that is implicitly
> a symbol of Marxist bureaucratic tendencies. Needless to say, this was
> not Mariategui's approach. I have been critical of Morales in the past
> but you have to put him into context. This is the first indigenous
> president of Bolivia, a country that has oppressed Indians for over 400
> years. The challenge to groups like CONAIE is to become part of a larger
> radical movement that can confront Morales for state power, while at the
> same time defending his government against attempts to subvert it. This
> is a delicate balancing act that requires a grasp of Marxism and
> revolutionary history. If there was greater attention paid to
> Mariategui, this would be a good first step.
>
>
>


________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to