======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


>
> Richard Seymour wrote:
>
> Let's be honest, Louis, you don't know anything.  About this, I mean.
> You don't know the difference between Malcolm X and the Tea Party, and
> you damned sure don't know why Jared Lee Loughner attempted the
> assassination of Gifford (as well as killing numerous others).  Your
> strategy so far is to latch on to any bit of gossip that will enable you
> to write it off as a simple case of a man gone bad, ignore everything
> else of relevance.  This stridency does not, you may be interested to
> know, convey confidence in your understanding of matters, any more than
> the retreat to non-sequiturs does.
>
>
I can think of various I might criticize LP for but confusing Malcolm X with
the Tea Party is not one of them.  RS's baiting, demagogic style in this
argument does him no favors. It is RS who has failed to produce solid
evidence that Loughner was a racist Tea Party murderer and not a simply a
very mentally ill man as an examination of what evidence does exist shows
him to be. Worse it appears that the evidence does not matter much to RS.
There are indeed real dangers from the racist right in the US, particularly
as we lurch ever deeper into crisis, but these dangers are not served by
adding to the already ample supply of demagoguery and fantasy. Unless
perhaps Loughner, in his schizophrenic delusion, was actually right and
words 'have no meaning' anymore.
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to