On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:54 PM, Charles Brown wrote: > > You know like woman\man giggles . You’re doing post structuralism , not > Marxism, neither dialectic nor materialism .
Thanks a lot for invalidating my non-binary identity based on some reference to "post-structuralism". Usually, people doing this cannot even properly state to which author they refer and their views. However, referring primarily to anthropological data studies of gender identity and biological science which confirms the existence of bimodality of sexuality and intersex. I personally doubt that persons like you aware of the complex nature of sex development and how even biologically we cannot state clearly on binarity. Moreover, none is caring about Marx's views in 1844 or some "dialectical reference". I am quite aware how Hegel constructed a lot in the lecture of aesthetics from wrong assumptions made in Winckelmann who wrongly assumed that greek statues were not painted as they were not to mention various misreading of Egyptian culture interpretation. So Marx's gender essentialism is very unfortunate and only reflects his limitations of views in typical XIX century heterosexualism. However, we are not living in XIX nor in XX and we know how historically binarity was a relatively recent notion. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5399): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/5399 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/79580220/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
