The Red Guards no doubt believed they were advancing socialism.  But their 
actions set back the struggle for socialism.

Mao initiated the Cultural Revolution as a strategy to restore himself to a 
position of unchallenged leadership.  He had been sidelined after the failure 
of the Great Leap Forward.  Probably he deluded himself that what he was doing 
was good for socialism.

But only a few years after the launch of the Cultural Revolution with 
ultra-revolutionary rhetoric, Nixon visited China at Mao's invitation.  A few 
years later Mao died. Deng Xiaoping took over and began the market reforms that 
led eventually to capitalist restoration.

For more details, see:

http://links.org.au/capitalism-workers-struggle-China

Chris Slee

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael Meeropol 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 1 February 2021 2:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [marxmail] Maoism and Trumpism

I am curious whether the "purpose" the RED GUARDS served had anything to do at 
all with building socialism in China?   I read William Hinton's long treatment 
in MR "The Cultural Revolution at Tsunghua (sp?) University and do not really 
remember whether the power struggle he described did ANYTHING for the future of 
socialism (forget "communism") in China.    It seems to me with hindsight that 
all the Cultural Revolution did was (by its excesses) create the situation for 
what seems to me to be another example of "revolution from above" (with a nod 
to Kotz and Weir's book by the same title about the former Soviet Union) --- 
the excesses made it easy for the new leaders to purge the "Gang of Four" and 
for Deng to take his revenge --- and for the infinitely corruptible bureaucracy 
to "follow the leaders" to introduce more and more elements of capitalism.

If we want to get really depressed we can say that Fukayama in his "end of 
history" analysis may have been right but for the wrong location --- the 
authoritarian capitalism of China makes the version that grew up in Japan after 
WW II seem almost anarchistic --- Given the impetus for more centralized 
control as the horrible effects of global warming create lots of death, 
destruction and chaos over the next decades --- China may be the model of 
survival while the rest of the world descends into Rosa Luxembourg's warning 
--- barbarism.

OF COURSE, it doesn't have to be like this and it's worth fighting as hard as 
possible on every front to protect the planet from what might already be 
inevitable --- because we don't know for sure it remains essential never to 
give up.   (of course it's easier for this 77 year old to say that than for the 
30 - 50 somethings who will unfortunately have to do the heavy lifting!)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 9:03 AM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

 In a way, the Red Guards had served their purpose: the middle management of 
the country was properly chastened and afraid of their elite masters. The 
bureaucracies that mediated between elites and ordinary people were either in 
tatters or so cowed as to make direct control frictionless. In sum, an alliance 
between a disempowered elite and a mostly-young and educated lower-middle class 
(using the still lower-class youth as enforcers) upended the middle section of 
society’s bureaucracy, to long-lasting effect.

II rewS readIiiII




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5991): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/5991
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80250914/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to