naive question: why "obviously"? because of word count in his writings
or because of some deeper principle?
Les
On 2/22/21 9:32 AM, Ed George wrote:
As a (rather tangential) consequence of something I’m working on at the moment
I’m looking at the use of the terms ‘historical materialism’ and ‘materialist
conception (etc.) of history’. Obviously, Marx never uses them.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6614): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/6614
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80825415/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
