Curtis is in line with filmmakers such as Morin, Rouch, an Marker in making
film essays, rather than expository dox; I guess you could file them under
the reflexive mode, whereas someone like Godard in squarely in the
performative mode. The Jacobin interview is pretty informative, although to
take a filmmaker's words is to court disaster since they are notoriously
bad at talking about their own films. His work is not about recapturing
events, but the emotional content of presenting film and images to speak to
real events, which documentary has the right to do, just like any other
film. Otherwise films like *Bontoc Eulogy* (Fuenties, 1995),  *Perfumed
NIghtmare* ( Tahimik , 1977), or *San Soleil *(Marker, 1983) become tangled
and loose their meaning in fact-checking. The important parts to consider
are 1) Curtis has a huge audience, 2) His film are out there for free (like
Scott Noble, the Ken Burns of radical film), and 3) the need for audiences
to self-educate themselves through new media is a pressing issue that his
work begins to answer.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/03/adam-curtis-bbc-cant-get-you-out-of-my-head-interview


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7710): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7710
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81803595/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to