David, I provided the links to to the websites of those two journals to show their sympathetic treatment of China and Russia and overriding hostility to US imperialism and NATO. I wasn't addressing the South China Sea question in particular and if, as you say, ML Today "leans against China's claim", that is a legitimate discusson to be had among those who do not believe China to be "imperialist".
Despite Charlie's contortions to prove otherwise, that's the indisputable position of Cariou and the Canadian CP as well as MLToday. Mine also, as you know, and I've already indicated, we're not likely to find common ground on an issue which has been exhaustively explored here and elsewhere and has left most of us with firm opinions. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#32210): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/32210 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/108368526/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
