I will take issue with Khalid Bhakdash's comments from 1932, during the period when the ultra-left "3rd Period" was winding down. Here Khalid Bhakdash's comments indicate opposition to cross class alliances as in this comment: “the party never went beyond the rightist positions of support for the national bourgeoisie, as is borne out by a program which speaks only of independence and social justice, without daring to propose an agrarian reform. For fear of alienating the bourgeoisie”. During what period did the Comintern actually oppose this? Indeed, it was only from 1928 through 1934 that the Comintern "looked like Trotskyists" in their opposition to this. This is one of the reason I would never use weasel terms like "Revisionist" or even "incorrect" unless one can point out definitionally how this is the case.
Otherwise great comments from both Hari and Michael K. David -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#33258): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33258 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109311913/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
