On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 03:03 PM, Mark Baugher wrote:

> 
> How would a multi-issue coalition have changed that besides making the
> opposition to the Vietnam War in the US smaller? The multi-issue
> coalitions failed during this time to move the needle. Do you think that
> the right set of demands would have ended the Vietnam War sooner after the
> US withdrew troops? The Chilean coup? Could we have done something to stop
> imperialism in its tracks in the 1965-73?

Great questions, and I have no great answers.  I don't think anything except 
general social revolution or earlier loss of control of the battlefield could 
have ended the war sooner, and nothing but mobilization of Chilean workers 
could have defeated the coup. The "broad democratic front" of the UP 
government, once considered "progressive," prevented that mobilization.  Could 
we have done something between 1965-1973? Yes, we could have pushed the 
movement-- the "broad movement" to link the incidents of imperialism to the 
system of imperialism .

I think the possibilities were there, existing only as possibilities But as 
soon as the "single issue front" gave a platform to Democrats, the 
possibilities began to  disappear.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#33473): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33473
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109441085/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to