I haven't seen anyone refusing to discuss or work with people who voted Democratic . . . which would fit the definition of "sectarianism."
But most of the time I hear this "move on" talk, it reminds me of how groups I've been in never want to do an evaluative balance sheet on a strategy or a tactic or a formulation or a line . . . Which I've always thought helpful, if not essential to the health of the movement. Just On Mon, Dec 30, 2024, 7:35 PM sartesian via groups.io <sartesian= [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 02:21 PM, John Reimann wrote: > > can we also move on? > > So why do you keep bringing it up? > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#34336): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/34336 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110347339/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
