On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:19 PM, Kristin Bayrd wrote: > > Maybe Trump is actually the uniter he said he would be. Wouldn’t that be > something? For a century now, Marxists have debated the utility of voting > for one of the bourgeois parties, the Democrats. What if that time is > changing now? What if the bourgeois party we orbit becomes the > Republicans? There are plenty of arguments against it, but there are > plenty of arguments against orbiting the Democrats too. And as the > Democrats continue their self-immolation, it might be the only option. > > Kristin > > >
Oh yeah, a real uniter. Why are the moderators allowing this "soft" and sly endorsement of emerging fascism on this list? Here's a thought--orbiting any bourgeois party anytime anywhere is a ticket to hell. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35078): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35078 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111057454/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
