Hello Dan:
Again I am not sure if you are referring to me, in addressing this note.
There seem to have been many entering this discussion. However - if you are 
referring to me - I should briefly reply.

On the basis of the on-going further dialogue - it seems clear to me that there 
is actually little difference between us.
To clarify:

You are correct to deduce, that I had in effect claimed that ultimately it all 
came down to war - in some remarks to Marv.
I should be more careful.
For I did not at all intend that statement to indicate that 'War was an "iron 
law" - which "ensures that such a transfer of power can only be the result of 
war." I can see why you come to this conclusion.

I do think that just as most Marxist-Leninists and Marxists would generally 
agree that the rule of an capitalist ruling class domestically in a single 
state - is most unlikely to be overcome by the proletarian or toilers except by 
the use of force. There may be rare exceptions - but overall it is most 
unlikely to happen peacefully. I think in the international imperialist realm 
similar considerations apply. I think it is most unlikely that a dominant 
imperialist bloc-country-alliance, would allow itself to be eclipsed by another 
country-bloc-alliance - without if it came to it, a war. Again, the exact 
circumstances that may arise between the USA and China are not yet sufficiently 
clear. But the positioning of China in as many places world wide as it can do 
so seems to me, to be predicated on ensuring a naval presence. This certainly 
was the case in the Bangla Desh recnet kerfuffle ( 
https://mlrg.online/world/bay-of-bengal-naval-cauldron-of-china-versus-usa-behind-the-drama-of-sheikh-hasinas-flight-from-dakka/
 );
and in the admittedly *trading* port development (rather than overt military) 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oPVZVrymdk ; 
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/11/21/china-builds-port-peru-us-old-trains/
 ;

Cheers H


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35603): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35603
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111412499/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to