On 7/18/06, Perrin Harkins <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 00:24 +1000, Justin Hawkins wrote:
> I like the idea of getting this to work neatly - separating each
> mason app into it's own little process(es) communicating via FastCGI
> would be a big improvement over Apache and mod_perl for me.
Nothing against Lighttpd, which is a cool project, but if anyone wants
to do this with apache, they can. There is more support work going into
mod_fastcgi (FastCGI for apache) now, and you can also just run a
mod_perl for each app and proxy to them with mod_proxy. I usually do
the latter, since I run a reverse proxy in front anyway for the static
stuff.
- Perrin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
--
--
Shane McCarron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
