On Fr, 2006-08-11 at 10:04 -0400, J Cook wrote: > Seriously, in your opinion what would it take to get something like that > going? I've tried both Jifty and Catalyst and I think Catalyst is the > more mature of the two, but I don't understand their preference with > Template Toolkit.
I think the preference for TT over Mason comes from the fact that you don't really need (or want) mason's component approach if everything is already divided into model, view and controller. TT keeps Perl away from your templates as far as possible (which is a good thing for web designers working on the HTML) whereas Mason makes it easy to throw in some Perl between your HTML, XML or whatever. I'm not sure, but TT may also be a bit faster due to its XS backend. Using Mason with Catalyst shouldn't be a problem though. HTH, Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
