/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */



Interesting.  By any chance did Compaq invest in Redhat like
Intel and others COs did?

Regardless, I need to ask you a personal favor here.  Please
begin the work and track down the person(s) at Compaq who 
would be responsible for Linux hardware support.  

Once you find him/her, relay this information to them and get 
them to contact James Banks (author of the Tlan drivers) to 
get this issue resolved.  Ok?

Also.. it strikes me odd that the 3c905 card was 100KB slowwer
than Intel card.  I understand that Tulip-based and Intel
NICs are the best supported under linux but the 3com cards 
should still be pretty fast.

--David



At 04:41 PM 7/17/99 -0500, Mark Mott wrote:
>David, and all,
>
>Just a note to let you know that my issue with the Proliant 2500 is the
>internal integrated Netelligent 10/100 NIC! Don't use it. Install two
>PCI NICs and this will resolve the problem.
>
>Many thanks to Jon Watts for his assistance.
>
>Details:
>
>The issue is with the TLAN Linux driver and the Proliant 2500 internal
>NIC. Even upgrading to Linux v2.2.10 (which increased the NICs download
>speed by 500%) still did not correct the stall problems. Our best guess
>is that Compaq modified (tweezed) the chipset or opcodes so that it no
>longer matches published specs, and the individual who wrote the TLAN
>driver did not have a Proliant 2500 to test with, so this was never
>caught. Also this server is on the Redhat approved hardware list!
>
>
>We tested each NIC I had to the cablemodem, and by using Netscape in
>Xwindows on the Proliant were able to identify that the stalls were
>unique to the integrated Compaq NIC. My new NIC config is a Intel
>EtherExpress Pro 10/100 using eepro100.c ( a remarketted Compaq WS NIC,
>not the server card) (which averaged 400KB/sec during downloads of a
>large .tar file) as the cablemodem pipe card and a 3Com Etherlink XL
>10/100 using 3c59x.c(which averaged 300KB/sec during downloads of the
>same .tar file) for the internal network.
>
>Interesting side note: We tested the standard 3Com Etherlink XL 10 only
>PCI card that @home installs by default using the same 3c59x.c, and it
>only gets 30 KB/sec during downloads of the same .tar file, so be warned
>that there is a big performance difference in the cards on the same 10
>Mbps pipe!
>
>I still have some fine tuning to do, including changing the window in
>all the route add spots in ifup, but that is for next week.
>
>
>Thought everyone would like to know. If you know of place where this
>needs to be posted to get to the rest of the people who need it, please
>forward.
>
>Thanks for everyone's help and attention.
>
>Original message: 
>
>
>Here is my current situation
>
>I have built my first Linux (RH6) Server. I
>haven't worked with Unix in almost 15 years. This has been a real
>learning experience.
>
>I need help with masquerading performance tuning. I have my server on a
>cable modem on
>eth0 and a 100M LAN on eth1. I have the email and brousing working, but
>downloads a incredibly slow and some web sites take forever to load (if
>not at all)
>while others pop right up. I also get monster email messages from
>home.com which time out when checking for new mail (I know I can
>unsubscribe from this, but I need to be able to get this type of email
>through my Linux MASQ server; so for now I log onto a direct Win95 PC
>and dump the @home junk).
>
>I'll spare you the details (other than I am
>on a Compaq Proliant 2500 (Pentium Pro 200) w/ 96M RAM and eth0 is on
>the integrated Compaq 10/100 NIC. 
>
>I am composing this on a Win95 PC through the masq. so it is working,
>but performance is  poor compared to connecting a Win95 PC direct to the
>same cablemodem.
>
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware         [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
!----                                                                    ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'


_______________________________________________
Masq maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/

Reply via email to