Sorry Erik.
Can you make a new patch against the current SVN?
Some of the patch was applied (but without scatterpoints option) in the SVN.
Thanks,

-JJ




On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No more thoughts on this?  Or was some version of the patch committed?
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, looking more closely, there is one thing that's still
>> bothering me:  as it is now, it's impossible to have, say, 2 points
>> for plotted values, and 3 points for scatter plots on the same legend
>> (you have to give a numpoints=# command that's shared by everything in
>> the legend, if I'm understanding it).  It'd be nice to have a
>> property, say, "scatterpoints" (and presumably then an associated
>> rcParam "legend.scatterpoints" ) that sets the number of points to use
>> for scatter plots.  That way, I can make plots just like in the
>> original form, but it can also be the same number for both if so
>> desired.  I've attached a patch based on the last one that does this,
>> although it probably needs to be changed to allow for an rcParam
>> 'legend.scatterplot' (I don't really know the procedure for adding a
>> new rcParam).
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The current patch looks good to me... it satisfies all the use cases I
>>> had in mind, and I can't think of much else that would be wanted.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> I also very much like the idea of the "sizebar," although that's
>>> probably a substantially larger job to implement. I may look into it
>>> though, time permitting...
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Jae-Joon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> To help clarify the original purpose of  "update_from": I wrote this
>>>>> method when writing the original legend implementation so the legend
>>>>> proxy objects could easily copy their style attributes from the
>>>>> underlying objects they were a proxy for (so not every property is
>>>>> copied, eg the xdata for line objects is not copied).  So the
>>>>> operating question should be: what properties do I need to copy to
>>>>> make the legend representation of the object.   While you are in
>>>>> there, perhaps you could clarify this in the docstrings of the
>>>>> update_from method.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for clarifying this, John.
>>>>
>>>> Manuel,
>>>> The patch looks good to me. We may submit the patch (I hope Erik is
>>>> okay with the current patch) and it would be great if you handle the
>>>> submission.
>>>>
>>>> -JJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Manuel Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Manuel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we need rotation value and etc, but my point is, do we need to
>>>>>> update it within the update_from() method? Although my preference is
>>>>>> not to do it, it may not matter much as far as we state what this
>>>>>> method does clearly in the doc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, it's probably better to create the object correctly (numsides ...)
>>>>> instead of copying the properties (see also JDHs mail !)
>>>>>
>>>>>> And, in your patch, I don't think updating the numsides value has any
>>>>>> effect as it does not recreate the paths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm attaching the revised patch. In this patch, update_from() only
>>>>>> update gc-related properties. And numsides, size, and rotations are
>>>>>> given during the object creation time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, this looks better. But creating handle_sizes is a little bit too
>>>>> much effort. This is done internally. It will do passing a sizes list,
>>>>> that may or may not be shorter/longer than numpoints (see revised patch).
>>>>>
>>>>> I also changed the way the yoffsets are updated in _update_positions().
>>>>>
>>>>> One additional thing I have in mind (for a later time) is a "sizesbar"
>>>>> similar to a colorbar where you can read off values corresponding to
>>>>> marker sizes...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>  Manuel
>>>>>
>>>>>> Erik,
>>>>>> I see your points. My main concern is that the yoffsets makes the
>>>>>> results a bit funny when numpoints is 2. The attached patch has a
>>>>>> varying sizes of [0.5*(max+min), max, min]. The yoffsets are only
>>>>>> introduced when numpints > 2 and you can also provide it as an
>>>>>> optional argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -JJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Manuel Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Manuel Metz wrote:
>>>>>>>> Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Manuel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it is a good to introduce the update_from method in 
>>>>>>>>> Collections.
>>>>>>>>> But, I'm not sure if it is a good idea to also update sizes, paths and
>>>>>>>>> rotation (in RegularPolyCoolection). My impression is that update_from
>>>>>>>>> method is to update gc related attributes. For comparison,
>>>>>>>>> Patch.update_from() does not update the path.
>>>>>>>> That's exactly the point why I wasn't fully happy with the patch. The
>>>>>>>> path is generated by the _path_generator, so instead of copying the 
>>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>>>  it seems to be better to create an instance of the corresponding class
>>>>>>>> (e.g. the StarPolygonCollection class, as suggested before).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   One should update the rotation attribute (!!); it's only one number. 
>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>> '+' marker, for example, has rotation = 0, whereas a 'x' marker has
>>>>>>>> rotation=pi/4. That's the only difference between those two !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, is it okay to update properties without checking its length?. It
>>>>>>>>> does not seem to cause any problems though.
>>>>>>>>   It's in principal not a problem to copy the sizes attribute without
>>>>>>>> checking the length. If it's shorter the the number of items the sizes
>>>>>>>> are repeated; if it's longer it gets truncated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess It would better to use xdata_markers than xdata in the
>>>>>>>>> get_handle() method. The difference is when numpoints==1. Using xdata
>>>>>>>>> gives two marker points.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was actually about to to commit my patch. I'll try to account your
>>>>>>>>> changes and post my version of patch later today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -JJ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Manuel Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> hmm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>>>>>> Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - the parameter numpoints should be used (it's ignored right now)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Manuel. I guess we can simply reuse xdata_marker for this 
>>>>>>>>>>> purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some private variables are accessed and a new 
>>>>>>>>>>>> RegularPolycollection is
>>>>>>>>>>>> created (does this work eg. with a StarPolygonCollection? I haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>> checked, but I don't think so !). Instead of creating a new
>>>>>>>>>>>> RegularPolyCollection it might be more useful to make a copy of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> existing object... I was thinking about a update_from() method for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Collection class(es) similar to update_from() for lines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By changing "RegularPolyCoolection"  to "type(handles)", it works 
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> StarPolygonCollection.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In Erik's current implementation, the markers in the legend have
>>>>>>>>>>> varying colors, sizes, and y offsets.
>>>>>>>>>>> The color variation seems fine. But do we need to vary the sizes and
>>>>>>>>>>> y-offsets? My inclination is to use a fixed size (median?) and a 
>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>> y offset. How does Erik and others think?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -JJ
>>>>>>>>>> Attached is my current version of the patch. I've moved all of the
>>>>>>>>>> properties-copying stuff to collections, which makes the changes
>>>>>>>>>> legend.py more clearer (but I'm not fully happy with the patch and
>>>>>>>>>> haven't commit anything yet)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jae-Joon,
>>>>>>>  so here is my revised version of the patch. What do you think ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Manuel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's 
>>>>> challenge
>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great 
>>>>> prizes
>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the 
>>>>> world
>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
>>>>> Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's 
>>>> challenge
>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great 
>>>> prizes
>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
>>>> Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Erik Tollerud
>> Graduate Student
>> Center For Cosmology
>> Department of Physics and Astronomy
>> 2142 Frederick Reines Hall
>> University of California, Irvine
>> Office Phone: (949)824-2587
>> Cell: (651)307-9409
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Erik Tollerud
> Graduate Student
> Center For Cosmology
> Department of Physics and Astronomy
> 2142 Frederick Reines Hall
> University of California, Irvine
> Office Phone: (949)824-2587
> Cell: (651)307-9409
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to