Hi Michael!

Thanks a lot, I've applied the changes to mathtext in my installation
and it works now!

Bernhard

On Feb 1, 2008 8:16 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this is a really good puzzle.
>
> I think the difference in ghostscript versions is a red herring.
> Ghostscript can be used to "distill" eps files, and therefore could be
> part of the production pipeline, but only if you set the ps.usedistiller
> rcParam.
>
> The problem in the broken .eps file you sent me was that it was
> including two STIXGeneral fonts, one with the characters produced by the
> mathtext engine, and one with the characters produced by the regular
> text engine.  Since they both had the same Postscript name, the
> Postscript interpreter presumably got confused and didn't know where to
> get characters from.
>
> Why was this happening?  I have a theory.  The mathtext engine looks for
> the fonts directly, since it knows they should be in the matplotlib
> installation directory, whereas the regular text engine was looking up
> the fonts through a more complex "font-finding" algorithm that finds
> fonts in a number of places on the system.  It's possible (and this is a
> huge guess) that on your "broken" machine, you have the STIXGeneral font
> installed somewhere other than the matplotlib installation directory
> (~/.fonts or /usr/share/fonts or something).  Matplotlib assumes that if
> two fonts have different paths that they are different fonts and *boom*
> you get two fonts with the same name in the Postscript file.  All that
> is just conjecture about your situation, but I was able to reproduce it
> here by copying the STIX fonts to ~/.fonts.
>
> I have fixed mathtext so it uses the font-finding mechanism, so that
> whenever anyone asks for "STIXGeneral", it should always get the same
> thing.  That has been fixed in SVN r4928.
>
> The problem with Ps+Type42+STIXGeneral still persists.  I'm pretty
> certain this is due to the size of the font file.  For that reason,
> Type3 is just a better option anyway, so I don't consider it a high
> priority -- but if you have a use case where it really matters,
> certainly let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
> Bernhard Voigt wrote:
> >> Well, I was able to fix the spacing problem with PDF+Type42.  That has
> >> now been fixed in SVN r4915 (and on the maintenance branch).  It's a
> >> simple patch that I'll forward to you.
> >
> > Thanks, that works!
> >
> >>> At home, using another gs version (8.15.0, instead of 8.15.2) also the
> >>> eps is ok with ps.fonttype 3, though the one with fonttype 42 is still
> >>> erroneous.
> >> It's always fun when an external dependency breaks something... ;)  I
> >> only have the fairly old gs 7.07, and it seems to always work with type
> >> 3, and sometimes break with type 42.  Can you do me a favor to save me
> >> the trouble of having to install a bunch of versions of ghostscript?
> >> Can you send me an eps of the same plot produced through gs 8.15.0 and
> >> 8.15.2?  I hope that by examining the differences there will be some
> >> clue as to the breakage.
> >
> > Attachted are plots produced with type 3. I thought it's the viewer
> > which produces the problems and gs is not involved in writing these
> > files, though. Isn't the ps backend producing the ps files on its own?
> >
> > Well, but somehow there is a difference in the eps files. I've on both
> > machines the same matplot version, but as I said, the eps produced at
> > home with type3 is ok, it's also ok viewing it a work with the newer
> > gs interpreter. The other way around does not work, files produced at
> > work produce errors when viewing on both machines.
> >
> > Hope the files are helpflull! Bernhard
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>> Thanks! Bernhard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 31, 2008 4:45 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> Can you send the source of your plot, and also your matplotlibrc file?
> >>>>
> >>>> Bernhard Voigt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael Droettboom
> >>>> Science Software Branch
> >>>> Operations and Engineering Division
> >>>> Space Telescope Science Institute
> >>>> Operated by AURA for NASA
> >>>>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Michael Droettboom
> >> Science Software Branch
> >> Operations and Engineering Division
> >> Space Telescope Science Institute
> >> Operated by AURA for NASA
> >>
>
> --
>
> Michael Droettboom
> Science Software Branch
> Operations and Engineering Division
> Space Telescope Science Institute
> Operated by AURA for NASA
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to