I tried using the feasible solution as initial conditions, but unfortunately
it didn't converge, which is really wired. I'm guessing the system topology
and parameters is causing trouble, and  I may want try to scale up the
generation and demand in the system and decrease the step size in order to
better search for a feasible solution.

Thank you very much!

*Fanjun Meng
Electrical Engineering
Missouri University of Science & Technology
[email protected] <[email protected]>*



On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Could you try using the feasible power flow solution (from runpf) as the
> starting point for runopf and try using MINOPF as the solver?
>
> pf_soln = runpf('case123');
> opt = mpoption('OPF_ALG', 500);
> r = runopf(pf_soln, opt);
>
> --
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
>
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Fanjun Meng wrote:
>
> Dear Dr. Zimmerman,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. I've tried different solvers including PDIPM,
> SCIPM, and TRALM, etc. All of these solvers still cannot converge while
> solving the IEEE 123 nodes distribution system for an OPF solution. So I'm
> wondering if it is diverging because the 123 nodes is a distribution system
> with a lot end branches not in a loop. Also I notice the lines in the 123
> nodes have very similar impedence (which is typical in a distribution
> system), will this cause singular or bad scaled matrix while solving for
> OPF?
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
>
> *Fanjun Meng
> *
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Besides the good suggestions you got from others, you may also want to try
>> a different solver. I assume you are using the default MIPS solver.
>> Sometimes it does encounter numerical trouble where other algorithms do not.
>> I haven't had the opportunity to dig into things to understand under what
>> circumstances this happens.
>>
>>  --
>> Ray Zimmerman
>> Senior Research Associate
>> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Fanjun Meng wrote:
>>
>> The voltage is given 4.16kV. I convert the impedances to p.u. by myself
>> with 1MVA base. Actually I have checked this model in 'runpf()' and the
>> result is almost the same as shown in IEEE 123 node profile. So I guess the
>> problem might be the generation cost setting. I'm trying to fix that
>> problem.
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>>
>> *Fanjun Meng
>> Electrical Engineering
>> Missouri University of Science & Technology
>> [email protected] <[email protected]>*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Simon Schneider 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>> Are the nodal voltage limits set wide enough(e.g. 0.9 an 1.1)?
>>> Another possible source could be a bad choice of baseMVA and base
>>> voltage.
>>> Do you convert the impedances  by yourself or are they already given in
>>> p.u?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>> Am 6/28/2011 10:05 PM, schrieb Fanjun Meng:
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> *Fanjun Meng*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Santiago Torres <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe the generation costs you are using for the opf are causing
>>>> problems.  Try to check that!.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>  Santiago
>>>>
>>>>   2011/6/28 Fanjun Meng <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much for your suggestion!
>>>>> Actually I did check the simple power flow result with constraints, the
>>>>> voltages, line flows, generations are all satisfied. That's why I'm 
>>>>> confused
>>>>> with this problem. Is it possible that the line impedences and system
>>>>> topology may cause matrix sigularity during OPF calculation iteration and
>>>>> fail to converge?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>
>>>>> *Fanjun Meng
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Santiago Torres <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The simple power flow has not constraints, so maybe with the settings
>>>>>> you are using the power flow converges and has solution, however when
>>>>>> you use the opf, some constraints can cause it does not converge.  Check 
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> the IEEE 123 node reported solution when using the simple power flow
>>>>>> is complying the constraints (ie voltages, power generation, power 
>>>>>> flows).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope this can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Santiago Torres
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   2011/6/28 Fanjun Meng <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been working on IEEE 123 nodes system and created a model for
>>>>>>> MatPower power flow. This model is basically a radial distribution 
>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>> with a single generation at substation and works fine when I can use
>>>>>>> runpf(), and it returns similar result as shown IEEE 123 node system 
>>>>>>> report.
>>>>>>> However, when I use the same model for runopf(), it shows
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Numerically Failed
>>>>>>> Did not converge in 4 iterations.
>>>>>>> Did not converge (0.10 seconds)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The total generation is very different from total demand, and bus
>>>>>>> voltages are at strange values (e.g. 1.836p.u. at reference bus). Also,
>>>>>>> generation cost Lambda are extremely high (e.g. 17528752586.76 $/MWh @ 
>>>>>>> bus
>>>>>>> 6). I have tried to add multiple DGs at different locations and change 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> system to a ring type system, but it didn't work out. Does anyone have 
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> suggestions or experiences to this problem? Your help is highly 
>>>>>>> appreciated!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a good day!*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fanjun Meng
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> Dr.-Ing. Santiago Torres
>>>>>> IEEE Senior Member
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Post-Doctoral Fellow
>>>>>> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
>>>>>> University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.dsee.fee.unicamp.br/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Albert Einstein, 400
>>>>>> 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brazil
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr.-Ing. Santiago Torres
>>>> IEEE Senior Member
>>>>
>>>> Post-Doctoral Fellow
>>>> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
>>>> University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dsee.fee.unicamp.br/
>>>>
>>>> Albert Einstein, 400
>>>> 13083-852, Campinas, SP, Brazil
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to