So let me know! On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, morteza keshavarz <[email protected]>wrote:
> Arash Jan Thanks, I have figured how to get it out. > > Regards, > > Morteza > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Arash Alimardani < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The Jacobian Matrix? or the derivative of Jacobian Matrix? I'm not >> positive, but I guess the problem formulation which matpower employes >> utilizes the derivative of it. I'll check it later for you. >> Tell me if you figure it out meanwhile. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:24 AM, morteza keshavarz < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Arash jan, one more thing and sorry for keep asking, Do you know How I >>> can get Jacobian matrix after last iteration in state estimation? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Morteza >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, morteza keshavarz < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for respond, So I should define new measurments for my case >>>> (118) like what they did in example test_se_14bus? >>>> >>>> Thanks again, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Arash Alimardani < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> All right. First of all, that code is enhanced in the new version: >>>>> 4.1. The modified code is in "se" folder. >>>>> Secondly, you need to define the measurements locations and types and >>>>> the measured data as input values in the new generic code. It works very >>>>> well as long as your network is observable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:42 AM, morteza keshavarz < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes I do get answer with just runing runse('case14') with plots or >>>>>> other cases but ('case118') doesnt work and gives error. the matpower is >>>>>> 4.1. I am new in Matpower please corect me if I am doing wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Arash Alimardani < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you mean other cases work? Are you using version 4.1? by >>>>>>> "runse" you mean "run_se"? >>>>>>> Do you get answer by runse('case14') without definging the >>>>>>> measurement parameters? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, morteza keshavarz < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can't do state estimation for case118 system and It gives me >>>>>>>> error of: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No remaining bad data, after discarding data 1 time(s). >>>>>>>> Largest value of B = NaN >>>>>>>> ??? NaN's cannot be converted to logicals. >>>>>>>> Error in ==> printpf at 168 >>>>>>>> nzld = find(bus(:, PD) | bus(:, QD)); >>>>>>>> Error in ==> runse at 187 >>>>>>>> printpf(baseMVA, bus, gen, branch, [], success, et, 1, mpopt); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other cases are working well after I just write : >>>>>>>> runse('case300') for example. I would be appreciate if some one >>>>>>>> tell me how I can fix for case118. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Morteza >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
