I just made one script for cas118 bus (put everything together !), so any information I need, appear on workspace.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Arash Alimardani <[email protected] > wrote: > So let me know! > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, morteza keshavarz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Arash Jan Thanks, I have figured how to get it out. >> >> Regards, >> >> Morteza >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Arash Alimardani < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The Jacobian Matrix? or the derivative of Jacobian Matrix? I'm not >>> positive, but I guess the problem formulation which matpower employes >>> utilizes the derivative of it. I'll check it later for you. >>> Tell me if you figure it out meanwhile. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:24 AM, morteza keshavarz < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Arash jan, one more thing and sorry for keep asking, Do you know How I >>>> can get Jacobian matrix after last iteration in state estimation? >>>> >>>> Many thanks, >>>> >>>> Morteza >>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, morteza keshavarz < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for respond, So I should define new measurments for my case >>>>> (118) like what they did in example test_se_14bus? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks again, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Arash Alimardani < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> All right. First of all, that code is enhanced in the new version: >>>>>> 4.1. The modified code is in "se" folder. >>>>>> Secondly, you need to define the measurements locations and types and >>>>>> the measured data as input values in the new generic code. It works very >>>>>> well as long as your network is observable. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:42 AM, morteza keshavarz < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes I do get answer with just runing runse('case14') with plots or >>>>>>> other cases but ('case118') doesnt work and gives error. the matpower is >>>>>>> 4.1. I am new in Matpower please corect me if I am doing wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Arash Alimardani < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you mean other cases work? Are you using version 4.1? by >>>>>>>> "runse" you mean "run_se"? >>>>>>>> Do you get answer by runse('case14') without definging the >>>>>>>> measurement parameters? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, morteza keshavarz < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can't do state estimation for case118 system and It gives me >>>>>>>>> error of: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No remaining bad data, after discarding data 1 time(s). >>>>>>>>> Largest value of B = NaN >>>>>>>>> ??? NaN's cannot be converted to logicals. >>>>>>>>> Error in ==> printpf at 168 >>>>>>>>> nzld = find(bus(:, PD) | bus(:, QD)); >>>>>>>>> Error in ==> runse at 187 >>>>>>>>> printpf(baseMVA, bus, gen, branch, [], success, et, 1, mpopt); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Other cases are working well after I just write : >>>>>>>>> runse('case300') for example. I would be appreciate if some one >>>>>>>>> tell me how I can fix for case118. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Morteza >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
