Even after removing links and generators from the struct I get *this*
warning. Do you think the PTDF is reliable enough once I have removed all
the malfunctioning links and nodes from the network? It is a huge network
(N = 1254, L = 1822). It is difficult to analyse by hand.

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Trivik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Even after removing links and generators from the struct I get *this*
> warning. Do you think the PTDF is reliable enough once I have removed all
> the malfunctioning links and nodes from the network? It is a huge network
> (N = 1254, L = 1822). It is difficult to analyse by hand.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Trivik <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I am doing some analysis with load redistribution. So when I remove
>> certain high load nodes, there are of course islands because I eventually
>> end up removing half the network and the average degree is about 3.2. The
>> reason surely could be the islanding effect.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> As long as you call int2ext() after changing the line status and bus
>>> type, so that they actually get removed from the matrices it should be
>>> sufficient. I did a little test with a network with two unconnected islands
>>> and it does complain of a singular matrix, as I expected. Have you checked
>>> if that is what is causing the problem for you?
>>>
>>> --
>>>  Ray Zimmerman
>>> Senior Research Associate
>>> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Trivik wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. I am making the line status zero and also making the removed buses
>>> as isolated. But apart from that is there anything else that I should
>>> change in the vectors of the mpc struct? I am still getting that warning
>>> with a smaller PTDF matrix generated this time.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The context of the error message is important. In this case, it has
>>>> nothing to do with the ill-conditioning of a matrix encountered by MIPS in
>>>> the AC OPF solution, rather the ill-conditioning of a matrix encountered in
>>>> forming the PTDF. I suppose it's possible that the same underlying network
>>>> conditions could cause both.
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure that the remaining system is fully-connected? I suspect
>>>> that the PTDF calculation may encounter singular matrices if the network is
>>>> not connected, though I haven't tested it.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest converting the indexing to a consecutive internal ordering
>>>> (and removing out-of-service branches, buses, etc) by calling ext2int()
>>>> *after* setting the line statuses to zero and *before* calling
>>>> makePTDF().
>>>>
>>>>   --
>>>> Ray Zimmerman
>>>> Senior Research Associate
>>>> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>>>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Ravikumar V wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Trivik Verma,
>>>>
>>>> This is Matlab error message appears when the matrix inverse is not
>>>> possible because of singular matrix. This shows that the power system
>>>> becomes unhealthy or ill-conditioning because of opening several lines.
>>>> Kindly refer previous posts on this topic.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01678.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Trivik <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could anyone help me??
>>>>>
>>>>> I am viewing a power grid using MATPOWER and for my simulations I need
>>>>> to remove a node together with its links. By doing so, I am changing
>>>>> mpc.branch(links,:) = 0. After removing the respective links, I am
>>>>> calculating PTDFs again. The first time is fine, but in the event of
>>>>> redistribution of flows, the next time I am removing about 10 percent of
>>>>> the nodes and calculating PTDFs. I get a warning as follows,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warning: Matrix is close to singular or badly scaled.
>>>>>          Results may be inaccurate. RCOND = 4.060450e-019.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I have to remove something else from the mpc struct as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Trivik
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WITH REGARDS,
>>>>
>>>> V. Ravikumar Pandi,
>>>> Masdar Institute, Abu Dhabi,
>>>> United Arab Emirates - 54224.
>>>> mobile : +971 5522 78027.
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> HAVE A NICE DAY
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to