I believe it depends on the system and on the individual line. Presumably, you 
would set RATE_A to the less of the two limits.

-- 
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645




On Oct 5, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> As we know, there are two restricting constraints for the MVA flows a 
> transmission line: a) Thermal limitation b) Stability limitation that (b) is 
> more restricted. As Ray stated, currently MATPOWER consider RATE_A. Hence, Is 
> it more reasonable to consider Stability limitation in RATE_A for short or 
> mid-term power system analysis?
> 
> -Reza
> 
> From: Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>
> To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 5:39 AM
> Subject: Re: comprehension question about RATE_A, RATE_B, RATE_C
> 
> The only one that is used currently by MATPOWER is the long term rating 
> (RATE_A), which is used to limit the MVA flows when running an OPF.
> 
> -- 
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 4, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Cansu Yildirim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>>  
>> I’m trying to model a network containing different voltage levels and I have 
>> to take account of the load of each branch in my network, so that my lines 
>> are not overloaded.
>> Therefore I wanted to fill in data for the long, short and emergency ratings 
>> (RATE_A,RATE_B,RATE_C). As far as I didn’t get anything wrong, these ratings 
>> define the allowable magnitude of the flow. Can anybody give me a proper 
>> definition? And how do they influence my power flow? How does matpower use 
>> this information?
>> And I’m not sure how to calculate these ratings. Is it enough to know the 
>> maximum allowable operating current and voltage rating for the cables?
>>  
>> I would be grateful for any help.
>>  
>> Kind regards,
>>  
>> Cansu Yildirim
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to