On 11-09-27 02:58 PM, Michelle Ziegmann wrote: > Will do - but do you want it on this page > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MHDOC/Install+Capture+Agent+V1.2 > or this page > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MHDOC/Install+Capture+Agent+V1.2 > or another place?
Those are both the same link ;) Let's do the 1.2 and trunk instructions since the device itself isn't easily compatible with 1.1 or older. G > Michelle > > On 9/27/2011 12:34 PM, Greg Logan wrote: >> On 11-09-27 10:47 AM, Dr Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >>> Yes, I now it now. >>> It would be very useful to have a single line of information, under >>> the Capture Agent installation, saying that this installation is not >>> needed for the MA device. >>> And a very short instruction about the MA setup. >>> It would save lots of time for newcomers. >> Michelle (or whomever), can you add something along the lines of >> >> "These instructions do not apply to the Epiphan Capture Device (ECD) >> (link to >> http://www.epiphan.com/products/other-applications/matterhorn/). >> Configuration of those devices is done via their administration UI >> located at http://my_ecd/admin"; >> >> To the CA install guide(s) please? >> >> G >> >>> Leslaw >>> >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Greg Logan wrote: >>> >>>> On 11-09-27 02:39 AM, Dr Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >>>>> Hi Kristof, >>>>> >>>>> Which driver have you selected during the MA installation? >>>>> There are on the list only the Epiphan vga2usb devices, plus two >>>>> other options: enter URL and 'don't need driver'. >>>>> Should I enter the MA URL? >>>> The ECA and the normal Matterhorn CA are two entirely separate >>>> pieces of >>>> equipment. You won't be prompted for a driver when setting up an ECA >>>> because you won't be installing anything... >>>> >>>> G >>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Kristof Keppens wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Where did you get this firmware from? I try to download it from >>>>>> the epiphan website ( >>>>>> http://epiphan.com/downloads/firmware/Davinci_Matterhorn ) and >>>>>> keep getting the 2.2.0c version. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/27/2011 08:40 AM, Dr Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >>>>>>> I have just received one with the 2.2.0e on it, which logically >>>>>>> should be a never version than .0d ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Leslaw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Kristof Keppens wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any info available on when we can expect the 2.2.0d >>>>>>>> firmware on the epiphan site. Without it our epiphan capture >>>>>>>> appliances are useless and we would very much like to start >>>>>>>> testing them with our opencast 1.2 server. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kristof >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/22/2011 05:40 PM, Greg Logan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11-09-22 12:43 AM, Kristof Keppens wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I've just tried the upgrade after disabling most features and >>>>>>>>>> setting >>>>>>>>>> streaming settings to the fastest + without a dvi connection >>>>>>>>>> active and >>>>>>>>>> now the upgrade succeeded. Thanks for the help. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> However after the update the device is still unable to >>>>>>>>>> register itself >>>>>>>>>> with the server. It seems that no request arrive at the >>>>>>>>>> server. Should >>>>>>>>>> we wait for the 2.2.0d firmware for this to work? >>>>>>>>> It won't work without it unfortunately. I'm surprised I >>>>>>>>> haven't seen >>>>>>>>> more complains on list, this bug affects (as far as I know) all >>>>>>>>> recent >>>>>>>>> versions of the firmware and I only recently caught it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've one more question about the appliance, there is the menu >>>>>>>>>> maintenance with settings for the maintenance server. What >>>>>>>>>> does this do >>>>>>>>>> and should we enable it ? >>>>>>>>> This is an Epiphan function, but I believe it allows remote >>>>>>>>> support of >>>>>>>>> the device from Epiphan's tech support staff. I've left mine >>>>>>>>> enabled >>>>>>>>> since it doesn't seem to hurt anything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also is there any way to monitor these devices ( through >>>>>>>>>> zabbix or >>>>>>>>>> nagios )? >>>>>>>>> Not yet. This has been requested, but I have not seen any >>>>>>>>> movement in >>>>>>>>> that regard. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
