On 11-11-24 07:32 AM, David Horwitz wrote: > I would also add a small bug that the device always seems to report 2 > capabilities: > - screen-and-audio > - camera > > Whatever channels you have enables. Like Leslaw our potential use cases > would call for seperate chanel selection and might well be deployed in a > venue with video.
Yes, this is a known issue. It's on my list, but as of yet is not complete. G > Thanks > > David > > On 11/24/2011 03:13 PM, Dr Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >> >> >> I did a number of capture tests today morning, and it seems to me that >> the device is working (almost). >> Here my observations so far: >> >> what is working: >> i) the device starts and complete the capture up to the second, >> and the nice thing (I did not noticed before) is the blue light coming >> on the box during the capture >> ii) the screen capture quality on the DVI channel is very good even >> for the bitrate 600kbits and 15 frames/sec >> but for the acceptable video channel quality, the bitrate must >> be at least 2500kbits with 25 frames/sec >> iii) picture-in-picture recording is working fine for: >> video outside DVI and video inside DVI >> >> what is not working: >> i) the independent streams selection is not working properly >> showing only one channel, like that: >> when the both channel are selected then Screen is only >> recorded (not Screen and the Camera) >> when the Screen is selected the Video cannel is recorded! I >> did this test twice to be sure. >> but when Camera is selected the video channel is recorded (so >> OK). >> >> I would like to have two independent streams recorded and played if >> this is possible. >> >> I have not tested the audio channel yet. >> >> The main problem still is the long time lag before the processing has >> started. The captured recording are staying in the 'Capturing' table >> showing the status 'capturing' (the workflow instance state is PAUSED >> then). >> In one case all jobs have started after 35min, but in another case the >> jobs started after about 45 min or even longer. >> >> Is it a setup somewhere, which obviously I don't know, that can >> shorten this lag? >> There is a warning I am getting frequently, which might be responsible: >> WARN(ScheduleServiceImpl:930) Could not validate Calendar: >> Calendar must contain at least one component. >> >> In summary, the EDC is finally working, and the above I believe are >> minor issues that can be easily rectified. >> >> So many thanks to Greg for his work! >> >> Leslaw >> >> >> >> On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Greg Logan wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> The updated firmware was released yesterday, and after testing overnight >>> the update appears to have fixed the current issues. Please update your >>> device with the firmware from >>> www.epiphan.com/downloads/firmware/Davinci_Matterhorn/beta.php >>> <http://www.epiphan.com/downloads/firmware/Davinci_Matterhorn/beta.php>. >>> >>> G >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
