Hi Rute,

Did you open a ticket in JIRA as Tobias suggested, to apply the recommended 
format of the rpm link for Wowza and FMS?

Regards,
Leslaw


On 11 Apr 2012, at 18:19, Rute Santos wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>     Looking at the Wowza tutorial link below, it seems that Wowza also needs 
> the "mp4:" after the application name and before the directory path in the 
> rtmp link. The only difference from FMS seems     to be that it requires the 
> "_definst_" instance name, which FMS assumes by default if no instance is 
> informed:
> 
> http://www.wowza.com/forums/content.php?35#playback
> 
> This is the relevant note:
> 
> Note: To play content that is not at the root of the content folder you must 
> add the default application instance name to the URL. For example if you have 
> a file at the path [install-dir]/content/myvideos/sample.mp4, the URLs for 
> the different stream technologies are:
> 
> Flash player (RTMP)
> Code:
> Server: rtmp://[wowza-address]/vod
> Stream: mp4:myvideos/sample.mp4
> 
> Single URL: rtmp://[wowza-address]/vod/_definst_/mp4:myvideos/sample.mp4
> 
> 
>     Thus, an rtmp link in the form: 
> rtmp://server/matterhorn-engage/_definst_/mp4:dir1/dir2/file.mp4 should work 
> with both FMS and Wowza. 
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     Rute
> 
> 
> On 4/9/2012 11:37 AM, Rute Santos wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ruben, Hank,
>> 
>>     I was looking at the Wowza documentation and it also has the concept of 
>> "application" as FMS does. So, I am just wondering if Wowza accepts both 
>> forms? I recall Hank said that the rtmp link is       working with Wowza as 
>> is, but I was wondering if he could try to use the other form and see if it 
>> works too? I am curious...
>>     Thanks,
>> 
>>     Rute
>>   
>> 
>> On 4/9/2012 11:33 AM, Hank Magnuski wrote:
>>> 
>>> The "application" convention is certainly present in Wowza and I believe 
>>> Red5 as well.
>>> 
>>> Hank
>>> 
>>> 2012/4/9 Rubén Pérez <[email protected]>
>>> It would be interesting to know if Wowza is effectively following the same 
>>> convention. We have already have bizarre integration problems with FMS 
>>> because it follows its own conventions as to the syntax of the media to 
>>> stream.
>>> 
>>> We would be happy to have that patch attached to the main source code, 
>>> since we are FMS users ourselves, but I think we shouldn't stick to a 
>>> certain notation if it's not shared by the popular streaming alternatives, 
>>> too (I'm not saying it's not, just willing to get confirmation of it). I 
>>> may be wrong here, but "application" seems like an internal FMS concept, 
>>> which may not be share by other streaming servers. It also seems to me like 
>>> an unnatural place to put the tag (I'd rather expect it to be before the 
>>> filename or at the beginning of the URL), that's why I'm trying to be 
>>> cautious here.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> 2012/4/9 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]>
>>> Hi Rute,
>>> 
>>> >    We use FMS here with our current system to stream mp4 files and the 
>>> > "mp4:" tag should come after the application name. So, if the file 
>>> > resides several directory levels below e.g. dir1/dir2/file.mp4, the rtmp 
>>> > link should contain "/app_name/mp4:dir1/dir2/file.mp4" and not 
>>> > "app_name/dir1/dir2/mp4:file.mp4". The links you list below don't have 
>>> > examples with many levels of directories. I don't know about Wowza, but I 
>>> > bet it is the same :)
>>> >    I have a patch for this if anyone is interested (how should I submit 
>>> > it?)
>>> 
>>> We are certainly interested to apply your patch if you've go this working! 
>>> The correct for submitting patches is the following:
>>> 
>>> 1) Open a ticket in JIRA describing your problem.
>>> 2) Us the "attach" function to attach your patch
>>> 
>>> Also feel free to let the developers (on [email protected]) 
>>> know that you've submitted a patch and would welcome feedback and 
>>> integration (optional step :-)
>>> 
>>> Tobias
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users







_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

Reply via email to