That was exactly my point. I didn't want to go and modify this and break it for the users of other streaming servers. I don't know if I should just commit it (and potentially break the trunk), or create a bug and attach it to this email, or perhaps to a bug report in Jira, I'm not sure.
Rubén Pérez TELTEK Video Research www.teltek.es 2012/9/4 Ruediger Rolf <[email protected]> > Hi Ruben, > > the current implementation works for us (with Wowza 3). MP4-Streaming with > Red5 does not work properly so it cannot really be tested. If the behaviour > of FMS is different. As you are a commiter and have the needed FMS server > why don't you fix this bug. I am willing to do a code review and do some > testing on Wowza. > > Rüdiger > > Am 04.09.2012 18:30, schrieb Rubén Pérez: > > I'm bringing this back to life because I'm seeing this bug has not been > corrected in the 1.4.x branch --the "mp4" prefix is still added before the > filename, and not right after the "application" part of the URL. > > However, I see an additional problem in FMS. For some reason I am unable > to comprehend, you can NOT specify the .flv suffix in the FLV files, or > they won't play. There is no way of disabling or changing this "feature". > If, we use the "flv:" format, the stream plays perfectly, as long as you > don't provide the extension at all i.e. > > rtmp://my.fms.server/demo/route/to/the/video.flv > > doesn't work, > > rtmp://my.fms.server/demo/flv:route/to/the/video.flv > > doesn't work either, but > > rtmp://my.fms.server/demo/flv:route/to/the/video > > > I checked this with .mp4 videos and the result is that 1 and 3 work. > > My question is: does the 3rd option work for the other streaming > servers, too. Because if it does, we have found a general way of writing > the streaming URLs which is independent from the server used, i.e. to > stream the file > > route/to/the/video.ext > > we use the URL > > rtmp://url.to.the.server/application_name/ext:route/to/the/video > > Can any of you confirm this? > > Regards > > Rubén Pérez > TELTEK Video Research > www.teltek.es > > > > 2012/4/13 Rute Santos <[email protected]> > >> Hi Leslaw, >> >> I've just updated the ticket. >> Thanks, >> >> Rute >> >> >> On 4/13/2012 5:07 AM, Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >> >> Hi Rute, >> >> Did you open a ticket in JIRA as Tobias suggested, to apply the >> recommended format of the rpm link for Wowza and FMS? >> >> Regards, >> Leslaw >> >> >> On 11 Apr 2012, at 18:19, Rute Santos wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Looking at the Wowza tutorial link below, it seems that Wowza also >> needs the "mp4:" after the application name and before the directory path >> in the rtmp link. The only difference from FMS seems to be that it requires >> the "_definst_" instance name, which FMS assumes by default if no instance >> is informed: >> >> http://www.wowza.com/forums/content.php?35#playback >> >> This is the relevant note: >> >> *Note:* To play content that is not at the root of the content folder >> you must add the default application instance name to the URL. For example >> if you have a file at the path *[install-dir]/content/myvideos/sample.mp4 >> *, the URLs for the different stream technologies are: >> >> *Flash player* (RTMP) >> Code: >> >> Server: rtmp://[wowza-address]/vod >> Stream: mp4:myvideos/sample.mp4 >> >> Single URL: rtmp://[wowza-address]/vod/_definst_/mp4:myvideos/sample.mp4 >> >> >> Thus, an rtmp link in the form: >> rtmp://server/matterhorn-engage/_definst_/mp4:dir1/dir2/file.mp4 should >> work with both FMS and Wowza. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rute >> >> >> On 4/9/2012 11:37 AM, Rute Santos wrote: >> >> Hi Ruben, Hank, >> >> I was looking at the Wowza documentation and it also has the concept >> of "application" as FMS does. So, I am just wondering if Wowza accepts both >> forms? I recall Hank said that the rtmp link is working with Wowza as is, >> but I was wondering if he could try to use the other form and see if it >> works too? I am curious... >> Thanks, >> >> Rute >> >> >> On 4/9/2012 11:33 AM, Hank Magnuski wrote: >> >> The "application" convention is certainly present in Wowza and I believe >> Red5 as well. >> >> Hank >> >> 2012/4/9 Rubén Pérez <[email protected]> >> >>> It would be interesting to know if Wowza is effectively following the >>> same convention. We have already have bizarre integration problems with FMS >>> because it follows its own conventions as to the syntax of the media to >>> stream. >>> >>> We would be happy to have that patch attached to the main source code, >>> since we are FMS users ourselves, but I think we shouldn't stick to a >>> certain notation if it's not shared by the popular streaming alternatives, >>> too (I'm not saying it's not, just willing to get confirmation of it). I >>> may be wrong here, but "application" seems like an internal FMS concept, >>> which may not be share by other streaming servers. It also seems to me like >>> an unnatural place to put the tag (I'd rather expect it to be before the >>> filename or at the beginning of the URL), that's why I'm trying to be >>> cautious here. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> 2012/4/9 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi Rute, >>>> >>>> > We use FMS here with our current system to stream mp4 files and >>>> the "mp4:" tag should come after the application name. So, if the file >>>> resides several directory levels below e.g. dir1/dir2/file.mp4, the rtmp >>>> link should contain "/app_name/mp4:dir1/dir2/file.mp4" and not >>>> "app_name/dir1/dir2/mp4:file.mp4". The links you list below don't have >>>> examples with many levels of directories. I don't know about Wowza, but I >>>> bet it is the same :) >>>> > I have a patch for this if anyone is interested (how should I >>>> submit it?) >>>> >>>> We are certainly interested to apply your patch if you've go this >>>> working! The correct for submitting patches is the following: >>>> >>>> 1) Open a ticket in JIRA describing your problem. >>>> 2) Us the "attach" function to attach your patch >>>> >>>> Also feel free to let the developers (on [email protected]) >>>> know that you've submitted a patch and would welcome feedback and >>>> integration (optional step :-) >>>> >>>> Tobias >>>> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > > -- > > ________________________________________________ > Rüdiger Rolf, M.A. > Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS > Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück > Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511 > E-Mail: [email protected] > Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > >
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
