From my point of view, the requirement is, to have a configurable
solution. And in my opinion, Osnabrück needs this too. Local solutiona are
always bad solutions. This thread is a good source for requirements
engineering and than you can update the ticke with a good global solution.

Nils

> I understand your concerns from your point of view. Not everyone wants
> to register their institution just to provide the student a better
> smartphone/tablet experience.
> When so many developers are against it I will rewrite the ticket
> information and only implement a local solution.
>
> Denis
>
> On 1/27/12 11:45 AM, Tobias Wunden wrote:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> you will get another -1 from my side. I very much welcome the mobile
>> application, but since it is a development that happened outside of the
>> project in terms of architecture, design and development and in addition
>> comes with its own license, I don't think it is wise for a couple of
>> reasons to add links to it from the out-of-the-box Matterhorn
>> installation:
>>
>> 1) It only works well for those installations that have been registered
>> with the developers (you).
>>
>> 2) It is not clear to me whether the app is a project that is officially
>> (from a community standpoint) a part of Matterhorn. I am not saying that
>> it isn't, but as long as that has not been sorted out, I see the link as
>> a prejudice to other "related" projects. Let's say I develop a new
>> capture device (that you may or may not buy), and that capture device
>> offers a unique feature that can be reached via an http link. Would you
>> want to have that link in the Matterhon admin ui out of the box? I don't
>> think so.
>>
>> In my mind, those institutions that offer video that is encoded for the
>> mobile client will make sure to integrate links to the client into their
>> presentation layer (portal, page, feeds, ...). Putting the link into the
>> engage ui out of the box is just one more thing that is working for some
>> but not for others.
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>> On 27.01.2012, at 11:06, Denis Meyer wrote:
>>
>>> Something like this came into my mind but Chris is obviously against
>>> it.
>>> I think we have to vote about it.
>>>
>>> On 1/27/12 8:47 AM, David Horwitz wrote:
>>>> An observation from an android phone user:
>>>>
>>>> - When I click on a link in the browser for a youtube video I get a
>>>> dialogue asking whether I want to open the video in the browser or the
>>>> youtube app, with an option to store my preference.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if its implementable for non google property but seems a
>>>> reasonable way to approach the issue.
>>>>
>>>> D
>>>>
>>>> On 01/27/2012 09:40 AM, Nils Birnbaum wrote:
>>>>> Some ideas that came in my mind:
>>>>>
>>>>> An institution could have a dedicated website for mobile devices or
>>>>> an
>>>>> app. So this has to be full customizable in the config. You need an
>>>>> on/off
>>>>> button, off by default, and key-value pairs for the URL and the link
>>>>> text.
>>>>>
>>>>> <opencas...>.mobile=on/off
>>>>> <opencas...>.mobile.url=link to app or mobile site
>>>>> <opencas...>.mobile.text = "Watch this episode on our mobile-site"
>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>> <opencas...>.mobile.text = "Watch this episode with the matterhor2go
>>>>> app"
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my two cent
>>>>> Nils
>>>>>
>>>>>> I meant it in the broad sense of the work, not the http sense.
>>>>>> Regardless, the
>>>>>> preference for not having this displayed as a default is still one I
>>>>>> hold.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (and the ticket explicitly says "If so, display a link (and/or sth.
>>>>>> else)
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> matterhorn2go app")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do UI changes normally go through a UX process as well?  We do want
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> keep
>>>>>> things consistent across our UIs, don't we?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Denis Meyer<[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ticket does not say "redirect", it explicitly says "display a
>>>>>>> link".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/26/12 10:23 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There was some brief discussion on this ticket,
>>>>>>>> http://opencast.jira.com/browse/MH-8525 , about whether the engage
>>>>>>>> UI
>>>>>>>> should detect the platform of the user and redirect them to the
>>>>>>>> Matterhorn2Go app.  I just want to clarify that I'm a -1 to this
>>>>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>> for the following reasons:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Lots of tablets play Matterhorn fine.
>>>>>>>> 2. matterhorn2go is not Matterhorn.  It's a separate project with
>>>>>>>> a separate license.  I think it's great, but it's not ECL and I
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> want to redirect users to it by default.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If this feature is going to be added then it should be able to be
>>>>>>>> disabled, and should be disabled by default.  Maybe even a
>>>>>>>> "redirect_on_tablet" key that points to a URL of some kind.  But
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> shouldn't be redirecting to matterhorn2go by default.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (I share Hanks view that there are likely to be many similar
>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>> that institutions may want to brand or value-add)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Matterhorn mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe please email
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Matterhorn mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe please email
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Matterhorn mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe please email
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Matterhorn mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe please email
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Matterhorn mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe please email
>>> [email protected]
>>> _______________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matterhorn mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please email
>> [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
>

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to