Backfill is enabled. The higher priority jobs are much shorter in requested walltime (1 hour vs 8). Requested resources in terms of number of nodes in this example/test is the same. --Joe
----- Original Message ----- From: George Wm Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Greenseid, Joseph M. Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tue Sep 02 16:06:29 2008 Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] lower priority jobs running first? is backfill enabled and are these small jobs? george wm turner high performance systems 812 855 5156 On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote: > i have a situation with my setup where i get the following from > `diagnose -p`: > > diagnosing job priority information (partition: ALL) > > Job PRIORITY* Cred(Class) FS(Group) > Serv(QTime:XFctr) > Weights -------- 1( 1) 500( 1) > 1( 1: 100) > > 552 -39900 0.0( 0.0) 99.7(-4000) > 0.3( 0.2:100.1) > 553 -39900 0.0( 0.0) 99.7(-4000) > 0.3( 0.2:100.1) > 554 -14899 38.4(25000) 61.4(-4000) > 0.2( 0.2:100.4) > 555 -14899 38.4(25000) 61.4(-4000) > 0.2( 0.2:100.3) > > Percent Contribution -------- 23.8( 23.8) 76.0( 76.0) > 0.2( 0.0: 0.2) > these lower priority (-39900) jobs will always run sooner than the > higher priority jobs (-14899). why? why wouldn't higher priority > jobs run first? > > thanks, > --Joe > _______________________________________________ > mauiusers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
_______________________________________________ mauiusers mailing list [email protected] http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
