Other than backfilling, in what situation(s) should Maui run jobs out of priority order?
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Greenseid, Joseph M. Sent: Tue 9/2/2008 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] lower priority jobs running first? Backfill is enabled. The higher priority jobs are much shorter in requested walltime (1 hour vs 8). Requested resources in terms of number of nodes in this example/test is the same. --Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: George Wm Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Greenseid, Joseph M. Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tue Sep 02 16:06:29 2008 Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] lower priority jobs running first? is backfill enabled and are these small jobs? george wm turner high performance systems 812 855 5156 On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote: > i have a situation with my setup where i get the following from > `diagnose -p`: > > diagnosing job priority information (partition: ALL) > > Job PRIORITY* Cred(Class) FS(Group) > Serv(QTime:XFctr) > Weights -------- 1( 1) 500( 1) > 1( 1: 100) > > 552 -39900 0.0( 0.0) 99.7(-4000) > 0.3( 0.2:100.1) > 553 -39900 0.0( 0.0) 99.7(-4000) > 0.3( 0.2:100.1) > 554 -14899 38.4(25000) 61.4(-4000) > 0.2( 0.2:100.4) > 555 -14899 38.4(25000) 61.4(-4000) > 0.2( 0.2:100.3) > > Percent Contribution -------- 23.8( 23.8) 76.0( 76.0) > 0.2( 0.0: 0.2) > these lower priority (-39900) jobs will always run sooner than the > higher priority jobs (-14899). why? why wouldn't higher priority > jobs run first? > > thanks, > --Joe > _______________________________________________ > mauiusers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
_______________________________________________ mauiusers mailing list [email protected] http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
