On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Pavel Tsekov <ptse...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello Denys, > > Monday, February 16, 2009, 3:15:45 PM, you wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Tsekov <ptse...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> You might not be aware but I am (still) one of the two official MC >>> maintainers. > >> De jure, maybe you are. De facto, the project is an orphan. > >> How many more times do I need to submit my patches >> to get your attention? > > If I am not mistaken most of your patches were incomplete and you > wouldn't bother to fix them.
Oh really. I just checked. http://mlblog.osdir.com/gnome.apps.mc.general/2004-10/index.shtml http://www.mail-archive.com/mc-devel@gnome.org/msg05103.html 24/10/2004 - I posted the patch for the 1st time sometime later - I added it to bug database as well 07/11/2005 - patch was rediscovered and an active discussion started (which means there was more than one reply per year) 12/08/2006 - patch got applied By this time, of course, I didn't track the fate of the patch. THREE YEARS for a teensy patch like this???!! http://mlblog.osdir.com/gnome.apps.mc.general/2004-10/txt4mW4MB9qlO.txt You are glacial. Another patch, which I posted more than once, and this one is not applied: http://www.mail-archive.com/mc-devel@gnome.org/msg05526.html You didn't even have any objections. You just dropped the ball. You know, I have more interesting things to do in this life than spending three more years getting it applied. Especially that it is a bit bigger, who knows, maybe I'm being optimistic about three years here... -- vda _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel