Why not stand up a SCCM 2007 site in a Development VM and use the free version? Sorry but this looks pretty obvious to me.
Thanks, Mark Sent from my iPhone On Jun 10, 2013, at 9:43 AM, JRIT <[email protected]> wrote: > The main reason is when we need to deploy something in silent mode, or need > to install with some Config files, and the EXE not support that. > > Re-develope is not a solution here, because a lot of disadvantage points. > > I am looking for a Admin Studio alternative, for free, as Admin Studio was > for SCCM 2007. > > Thank you, > > > > 2013/6/10 Jason Sandys <[email protected]> >> Why? ConfigMgr 2012 deploys EXEs fine. There is no need to convert to an MSI. >> >> >> >> J >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of JRIT >> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:33 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Admin Studio??? >> >> >> >> But we need to repackage some SW, is not all possible to deploy only in EXE. >> Some legacy or in-house SW need to be transformed in MSI. >> >> >> >> >> 2013/6/9 Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]> >> >> Don't do any repackaging just use what the original source is. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: JRIT [[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 09:27 PM Eastern Standard Time >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [MDT-OSD] Admin Studio??? >> >> Hi guys, >> >> When I had SCCM 2007 I used Admin Studio from Flexera do repackage my EXE to >> MSI files, for free. But now, in SCCM 2012, Flexera don't offer a free >> edition of Admin Studio. >> >> What you guys are using to repackage EXE into MSI for SCCM 2012? >> >> >> >> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to >> which it is addressed >> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this >> material/information in error, >> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. >> >
