I thought that your ConfigMgr Primary server must be a domain member, is that not the case anymore?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, S ConfigMgr <configmgrarch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a requirement to implement ConfigMgrCB in no trust forest(s) > > I can understand that we can follow this link http://blog.coretech.dk/ > kea/multi-forest-support-in-configmgr-2012-part-i-managing-clients-in-an- > untrusted-forest/ and the same was explained in ms TechNet document > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/plan-design/hierarchy/ > communications-between-endpoints#BKMK_clientspan under (communications > Across AD Forest Section). > > I have below Questions to experts in this forum. > > What are the ConfigMgrCB features are not supported when I implemented > above no Forest level Trust? > > What features are not included if I implemented above scenario ? > > Is there any limitation of number Devices or User's management in > non-Forest’s scenario ? > > What happens if I implement ConfigMgrCB in Internet mode only ? Do we > think this is a best scenario to go for internet based ? > > Note:- my client is strict and not ready to go for Forest to Forest > Trust... Hence these questions come. > > >