That is still correct, but it doesn’t limit client management in any way.

J

From: <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> on behalf of Stephen Owen 
<sre...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "mdtosd@lists.myITforum.com" <mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 8:10 PM
To: "mdtosd@lists.myITforum.com" <mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com>
Cc: "ms...@lists.myitforum.com" <ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] ConfigMgr CB Design Question - Multi Forest No trust

I thought that your ConfigMgr Primary server must be a domain member, is that 
not the case anymore?

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, S ConfigMgr 
<configmgrarch...@gmail.com<mailto:configmgrarch...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I have a requirement to implement ConfigMgrCB in no trust forest(s)

I can understand that we can follow this link 
http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/multi-forest-support-in-configmgr-2012-part-i-managing-clients-in-an-untrusted-forest/
   and the same was explained in ms TechNet document 
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/plan-design/hierarchy/communications-between-endpoints#BKMK_clientspan
 under (communications Across AD Forest Section).

I have below Questions to experts in this forum.

What are the ConfigMgrCB features are not supported when I implemented above no 
Forest level Trust?

What features are not included if I implemented above scenario ?

Is there any limitation of number Devices or User's management in non-Forest’s 
scenario ?

What happens if I implement ConfigMgrCB in Internet mode only ? Do we think 
this is a best scenario to go for internet based ?

Note:- my client is strict and not ready to go for Forest to Forest Trust... 
Hence these questions come.



Reply via email to