November 3, 2009

A Free Credit Score Followed by a Monthly Bill
By RON LIEBER
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/your-money/credit-scores/03scores.html?_r=1&ref=business&pagewanted=print


On television it’s hard to miss the wildly popular band of slackers 
singing ruefully from a shabby apartment or while waiting tables in 
pirate regalia. The ruined credit that led to their financial misfortune 
might have been sparkling if only they’d tracked their status on 
freecreditreport.com.

The Federal Trade Commission is not amused. It has long believed that 
the company that owns freecreditreport.com is deliberately diverting 
people from a government-mandated site where consumers can get free 
credit reports by law, and using the reports as a lure for a $14.95 
monthly service that alerts subscribers to important changes in their 
credit status.

In an unusual salvo, the government has even produced its own spoof 
videos featuring a trio remarkably similar to the gang in the earlier 
commercials, singing a warning: “Other sites may turn your head; they 
say they’re free, don’t be misled. Once you’re in their tangled web, 
they’ll sell you something else instead.”

But while the government has taken issue with the ads, it has had little 
to say about credit monitoring services themselves, a rapidly expanding 
niche approaching $1 billion in sales for which millions of people have 
signed up, often unwittingly. The problem, say critics, is that most 
people really don’t need it.

Credit monitoring provides customers with real-time updates about 
changes to their credit files that might affect how lenders see them. 
These services can be useful for identity theft victims, for example, 
who want e-mail alerts about new accounts that thieves might have opened 
in their name.

Yet for the vast majority of consumers whose credit status doesn’t 
change quickly or drastically, a monitoring service is a waste of money, 
these critics say. Keeping a close eye on your bills and checking your 
credit report several times a year is enough.

And that can be done without spending a penny because the government 
requires the three major credit bureaus — Experian, which owns 
freecreditreport.com, Equifax and TransUnion — to provide one free 
report annually to consumers.

“Does the average person really need to see their credit reports more 
than once every four months? Do you need to look at it daily?” asked 
Edgar Dworsky, founder of ConsumerWorld.org and a former member of 
Experian’s consumer advisory panel, referring to credit monitoring 
services. “That’s paranoia.”

While other companies sell credit monitoring too, Experian is the 
biggest player in the lucrative niche of selling monthly monitoring. 
Nine million people are spending a total of $650 million to $700 million 
annually on the services, according to Carter Malloy, a Stephens Inc. 
analyst. Experian’s market share is more than twice that of its three 
main competitors combined. To replenish its rolls, the company relies 
heavily on its slacker ads, spending $54 million in 2008 to blanket the 
airwaves, according to TNS Media Intelligence.

The monitoring business is profitable enough that big credit card 
companies, including Capital One and Discover, now partner with Experian 
to sell private-label versions of the monitoring service directly to 
their customers, taking a cut of the fees and giving the rest to Experian.

So far, the F.T.C. has focused mostly on the free credit report come-on. 
In the last five years, Experian has paid $1.25 million to settle F.T.C. 
charges that it misled consumers who may have been seeking their free 
credit report at AnnualCreditReport.com, but ended up paying for a 
subscription on the similarly named freecreditreport.com.

Still, Experian continued to spend heavily on marketing that played to 
the anxiety many Americans feel about their credit amid the financial 
crisis. In an attempt to counter it, Congress attached a measure to a 
recently passed credit card reform law directing the F.T.C. to press 
sites like freecreditreport.com to provide more prominent disclosures.

Ty Taylor, president of Experian’s Consumer Direct division, said the 
company’s process was transparent. “You get a free credit report and 
free score for test-driving our product,” he said, referring to the 
credit monitoring service. “We’ve always felt that it’s been very 
upfront and a fair opportunity for the consumer to become more aware and 
comfortable with the credit reporting concept.”

Profiting From Confusion

Twenty years ago, the only way for most consumers to get a sense of 
their credit history was by buying their credit report from credit 
bureaus or getting it free if a lender rejected a loan because of 
something in the report. Credit reports contain, among other things, a 
list of past and current creditors and a record of the borrower’s 
payment history.

Meanwhile, a company called Fair Isaac had invented an algorithm for 
what is known as the FICO credit score. Scores range from 300 to 850 and 
helped lenders create high-priced loans for people with checkered 
histories while reserving the best rates for people with high scores.

The FICO score grew in importance in the mid-1990s as Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac encouraged mortgage lenders to use them. Around the same 
time, a company called ConsumerInfo.com began selling credit monitoring. 
It acquired the freecreditreport.com domain name and gave out free 
credit reports (and, eventually, free credit scores) if consumers 
subscribed to the monitoring service. Experian bought the company in 2002.

The next year, to grant consumers better access to their credit 
information and allow them to check for errors, Congress required the 
three credit bureaus to give one free credit report to every American 
each year. Almost immediately, however, consumers started confusing the 
government-authorized site, AnnualCreditReport.com, with Experian’s 
freecreditreport.com site. Smelling opportunity, Experian bought ads on 
Google and other sites that diverted some people looking for their 
legally mandated credit reports.

At one point, the F.T.C. asked Experian to give it the 
freecreditreport.com URL to end the confusion, but the company declined. 
“Experian was not going to give it up,” said a spokeswoman, noting that 
the site had been in operation for years. The F.T.C. has since set up 
its own site at freecreditreport.gov.

Evan Hendricks, who used to serve on the consumer advisory panel for 
Experian and is now the editor and publisher of Privacy Times, said the 
company knew the Web site’s name would sow confusion.

“We had these roaring debates, saying you can’t call it 
freecreditreport.com because it’s not free,” said Mr. Hendricks, who has 
also been an expert witness on behalf of consumers suing to correct 
errors in their reports and has testified against Experian. “We had put 
them on notice,” he said. “But the money spoke louder.”

Peg Smith, Experian’s executive vice president of investor relations, 
said the company had to balance such feedback “against the overall needs 
of the nine million customers we already have, plus the overall 
commercial needs.” Experian allows users to cancel the monitoring 
service during a brief free trial period and keep the free credit report.

High Turnover

In many ways, this is the perfect moment for companies like Experian to 
convince consumers that they need to track their credit closely. Many 
people who fell behind on bills in the economic maelstrom worry about 
how their credit report will look to lenders now. A number of employers 
reject candidates with poor credit, too.

Even millions of the most careful consumers worry that they may not have 
escaped recent damage to their credit files: card issuers, in an attempt 
to limit risk, have cut credit limits, canceled dormant accounts and 
made other moves that can harm credit scores.

Preeti Sharma, a 36-year-old information technology manager in 
Princeton, N.J., signed up for Experian’s monitoring service when she 
and her husband were seeking a mortgage and worried about surprises that 
could increase their interest rate. “It brings in another angle that you 
don’t think about on a daily basis,” she said. Some, including Ms. 
Sharma, stick with the service afterward.

“Consumers just have an insatiable appetite to know what other people 
know about them,“ said Don Robert, Experian’s chief executive.

But many customers who sign up for credit monitoring quickly drop it. 
Michael Schwartz, 63, a retiree in Little Silver, N.J., canceled his 
Experian subscription after he realized he was paying a charge for a 
tool he didn’t need. With his house and cars paid off, and his children 
no longer in school, “it’s not really going to be critical to check 
credit on a monthly basis,” he added. Experian declined to provide 
turnover figures, but it said the average enrollment of a monitoring 
subscriber was under a year.

That is one reason its growing library of commercials is critical to 
replenishing its subscriber base and revenue, especially among the 
younger demographic profiled in the ads.

Philip Neustrom, a 25-year-old software engineer in San Francisco, 
canceled the Experian service after paying six months of $14.95 monthly 
fees and never using the monitoring. “I knew they had roped me into this 
thing after I started getting these e-mails,” he said. It took him a 
while to get around to canceling, he added, because he was busy and 
“there are only so many things you can do in a day.”

John Ulzheimer, who spent 13 years working for two rivals, said 
companies like Experian counted on consumers behaving this way. “It says 
it’s free in the song, but if you don’t cancel, then you start getting 
hit with a very nominal fee,” he said. “Consumers are busy, and studies 
have shown that they don’t do a very good job scouring their credit card 
statements. And they’ll generally discount a charge that is very low.”

‘A Big Moneymaker’

All of this has been good for Experian. At a time when many other 
financial services firms were struggling, revenue in its consumer credit 
business grew 20 percent in North America during the 12 months ended 
March 31. Experian said sales grew about 10 percent in the six months 
that ended Sept. 30 compared with the same period last year.

But even for its most useful function — spotting identity theft — credit 
monitoring is not foolproof, because evidence doesn’t always appear on 
credit reports or set off an alert. Thieves can evade notice when 
opening new bank accounts in a victim’s name, running up charges on 
existing accounts or using a victim’s identity to obtain medical care.

Consumers who don’t want to pay for monitoring can get one of their 
three free annual reports from each credit bureau every four months. New 
services like Credit.com, where Mr. Ulzheimer is the president of its 
educational services arm, CreditKarma and Quizzle can also provide free 
credit snapshots, though they generally don’t alert customers to changes 
in their reports.

Last month, in the wake of the new credit card legislation, the F.T.C. 
proposed that companies like Experian that market free credit reports 
show customers an entirely separate Web page before they enter credit 
card information and sign up for credit monitoring. The page would 
remind them that AnnualCreditReport.com is the only federally authorized 
site for free reports.

Experian, which has a less prominent disclosure, declined to predict how 
many subscribers a rule like that could cost it.

But for people like Alex Salb, a 22-year-old freelance copywriter in San 
Francisco, greater disclosure would not change perceptions about the 
underlying nature of the business.

He went to freecreditreport.com during his apartment hunt. But once he 
understood that the true purpose of the site was to hook people into a 
continuing monitoring subscription, he backed away. “It’s a big 
moneymaker. I’ve seen it from the inside,” said Mr. Salb, who used to 
sell subscriptions for personal life coaching.

“And it’s intentional. It’s not a slip-up on their part.”

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204 
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to