Why Apple hasn't cracked the TV market

By David Goldman
CNNMoneyTech

August 17, 2012: 12:31 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/17/technology/apple-tv/index.html


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- After seeing how Apple upended the music and 
wireless industries over the past decade, cable operators want to make 
sure that their industry isn't next in line to get an Apple makeover.

Apple is widely reported to be in negotiations with cable companies to 
add live television access to a future Apple TV device -- perhaps an 
actual TV, but possibly something else. A Wall Street Journal report 
this week cited sources who claimed knowledge of Apple's attempts to get 
cable companies on board with an Apple-designed set-top box.

The device would be sold to consumers directly by Apple, and the tech 
giant would like to take a 30% cut of movies and apps that customers 
purchase on the box. The cable companies would be in charge of ensuring 
the viability of the service, including fixing malfunctioning devices.

In other words, Apple wants to be the shiny, user-friendly face of the 
device and let the cable companies do the dirty, unappreciated work. The 
industry term for this is a "dumb pipe": a company that is responsible 
for delivering a service but has no say in what flows through its 
network and no direct control over the customer experience.

That's exactly what happened to the wireless and music industries when 
Apple introduced iTunes and the iPhone.

The music industry lost much of its control over how music is sold and 
marketed to consumers, which contributed to a decade of declines in 
overall music revenues. With the iPhone, wireless companies like AT&T 
and Verizon lost the ability to make money on or control app sales, text 
messages and, increasingly, even phone calls. (If you're using Skype on 
your smartphone, you're not using voice minutes.) The carriers were 
forced to build out and support wildly expensive data networks and 
change their business model to make money on metered data services.

"The iPhone came along and radically changed the industry," AT&T CEO 
Randall Stephenson said last month at Fortune's Brainstorm Tech 
conference. "The industry has grappled with getting the pricing model 
turned."

Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and the rest of the nation's cable companies 
want to avoid a similar fate, industry experts say.

"History is a wonderful teacher," says Steve Beck, managing partner of 
cg42, a boutique consulting firm with expertise in the 
telecommunications and cable sectors. "Cable companies look at the music 
industry pre- and post-iTunes and the wireless industry pre- and 
post-iPhone and the control Apple exerted, and they want no part of that."

Cable companies would also be welcoming a rival -- or, more accurately, 
rivals -- into their midst if they partner with Apple. In its current 
form, Apple TV supports Netflix, Hulu, MLB TV and other services that 
compete directly with cable subscriptions.

Right now, the cable giants have a fairly well-defended empire. Verizon 
FiOS, AT&T U-Verse and satellite providers DirecTV and Dish Network have 
lured some cable customers away, but none are breakaway winners in 
usability, price, customer satisfaction or scale. (FiOS comes the closest.)

If Apple were to make a radically better cable box that works with any 
provider's service, cable TV would quickly become a commodity. There 
would probably be an advantage for the first provider to take the 
plunge, but whatever bump the first adopter received would eventually 
subside once all competitors began to carry the box. Cue the inevitable 
price wars.

"It's not surprising that they're looking at this very cautiously," Beck 
says. "In this industry, the potential uptick of customer acquisition or 
retention doesn't seem to be offset by the massive risk."

That's not something consumers want to hear. Apple is zooming in on the 
TV market because it knows there's a huge audience dying for simpler, 
more elegant solutions. Set-top boxes are notoriously difficult to use, 
particularly for content discovery, and cable providers' relationships 
with their customers are usually testy. Consumers consistently rank 
cable companies among the worst in customer satisfaction in the annual 
American Customer Satisfaction Index. (Apple, by contrast, has gotten 
the highest marks in customer satisfaction over the past several years.)

Still, despite all those obstacles, there seems to be something of an 
inevitability around Apple's entry into the TV space. Cable isn't yet 
faced with its Napster moment: Cord-cutting is a growing but still 
relatively contained phenomenon.

But as the companies lose customers to cheaper alternatives, including 
online streaming, they may begin to look to Apple as a white knight.

"Apple will eventually find a willing partner," Beck says. "The question 
is only how much that partnership will constrain the original vision of 
Apple's product. If Apple has to give in, it will be a hobby that didn't 
live up to the original idea." To top of page


_______________________________________________

Please be sure to include a URL to the article. Reply to the sender with a 
"Thank you" if you like this post.
_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to