Platonides schrieb: > Because half-fixes are easier than a full one? Yes, it seems to be a matter of attitude.
> If you provided a full fix (without breaking anything), it would be > accepted No one can provide a "full fix", especially without breaking anything, without a community agreement and support of the idea. > Also, some of the gaps > have been closed (such as addtion of $wgNonIncludableNamespaces). Yes. This was my starting point - there is definitely interest and work in this direction, but there isn't even one solution which provides this in a stable way without red warning text. >> There are items, which management, for instance, does not want available >> to everyone, while in preparation. It is not about things being secret. > Is it so important that nothing can be discovered, then? > Getting a piece of text you weren't supposed to read on the search > summary isn't so bad if that is going to be published in a few days. Of course, one can endlessly discuss this. It is simply nice to announce things when ready and not have rumors spreading around and people asking questions. I never said MedaiWiki must address this issue. Just wanted to know how far it is from solving it and what is the mood. The feeling I have is that it is quite far and the mood is not very enthusiastic :) Thanks, anyway! Iv _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
