Very useful answers, thank you very much for answering!

These useful hints could (should) be addded to the relevant variable 
pages on mediawiki.org, I think. Mind if I add them?

// Rolf Lampa

Platonides wrote:
> Rolf Lampa [RIL] wrote:
>   
>> 2. $wgParserCacheType *
>>     
> Cache for the result of rendering a page. Rendering the wikitext is very
> intensive, thus it should be cached.
>
>   
>> 3. $wgMessageCacheType *    // found no documentation
>>     
> It refers to the interface messages. They are used all the time. It's a
> good idea to cache them.
>
>
>
>   
>> == Question 2 ==
>>
>> What are the benefits and draw backs with using either of the two 
>> options below, after excluding the other options?
>> * CACHE_DB
>> * CACHE_ACCEL - (eAccelerator in my case)
>>     
>
> CACHE_DB uses the database, and thus performs worse than a specific
> cache accelerator. It may also produce db deadlocks.
>
> CACHE_ACCEL seems a good solution for your case. If you had several
> servers, they would have independent caches, that's why memcached is
> preferred, but since it's on a single box, seems ok.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to