Benjamin Lees skrev: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rolf Lampa [RIL] > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Benjamin Lees wrote: >> >>> File caching is definitely worth it ... fetching a page stored in the >>> file cache >>> was about 5 times faster than Memcached/eAccelerator. >>> <...> >>> In any event, you still need the other cache types, since the file cache >>> only works for anonymous users. >>> <...> >>> Just to be sure, did you look at >>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Cache ? >>> >>> >> Thank you for answering, it was helpful to realize how all the cache >> types cooperate. >> >> ( I also had missed the above link! <looking blushed> ) >> >> >> > I can see why you missed it. I've added some links to make it easier to > find. > >
I suggested some more additions to the article text on the discussion page, based on your an Plaitonides comments. Please check if I got it right, and if not, correct. And add whatever essentials missing. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual_talk:$wgParserCacheType The other closely related variables could (should) be commented as well (file cache seems to be commented here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:File_cache ). // Rolf Lampa <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgParserCacheType> _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
