On 05/19/10 17:12, David Gerard wrote:
> On 19 May 2010 16:08, Chad wrote:
> 
>> So to answer the original question of "Why don't we have WYSIWYG
>> when it's been around for 15 years?" It's because we need a lossless
>> conversion between raw wikitext and wikitext output by the visual
>> editor. Last time I checked, this was the major flaw that FCK and CK
>> editor still haven't overcome.
> 
> 
> It just (just!) has to not mangle the wikitext, or at least not in
> semantically significant ways. Only interact with what it understands
> and not trash the rest.
> 
> That would, of course, be the bug I just reported, where it was doing
> precisely that ...

This mangling is the biggest complaint I see on the OOoWiki.  Users who 
edit a page with the FCKEditor make a change and save.  Behind the 
scenes the FCKEditor has completely rearranged the raw wiki syntax.  So 
a minor change turns into a 100% content change with you do a compare in 
the history.

I'd love to know a workaround to this... other than removing the FCKEditor.

C.

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to